Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27628050›Full record

ReviewSmall GTPases2016

Rho GTPases: Regulation and roles in cancer cell biology.

Raquel B Haga, Anne J Ridley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small GTPases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 318 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
318citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

318 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 553 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. How Functional Variants Reconfigure the Rac2 Conformational Landscape.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

258 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raquel B Hagaa Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London , London , UK.
Anne J Ridleya Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London , London , UK.
King's College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rho GTPases are well known for their roles in regulating cell migration, and also contribute to a variety of other cellular responses. They are subdivided into 2 groups: typical and atypical. The typical Rho family members, including RhoA, Rac1 and Cdc42, cycle between an active GTP-bound and inactive GDP-bound conformation, and are regulated by GEFs, GAPs and GDIs, whereas atypical Rho family members have amino acid substitutions that alter their ability to interact with GTP/GDP and hence are regulated by different mechanisms. Both typical and atypical Rho GTPases contribute to cancer progression. In a few cancers, RhoA or Rac1 are mutated, but in most cancers expression levels and/or activity of Rho GTPases is altered. Rho GTPase signaling could therefore be therapeutically targeted in cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsCell MovementDisease ProgressionHumansNeoplasmsrho GTP-Binding ProteinsSignal Transductionrho GTP-Binding Proteinscancer progressioncell migrationRho GTPasessignal transduction

Identifiers

PMID27628050
PMCPMC5129894
OpenAlexW2520842278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.