ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2016
An Alternative Intraoperative Radiographic Method for Optimizing Cup Inclination during Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDuring total hip arthroplasty (THA), the location of the acetabular prosthesis is very important for guaranteeing successful surgery. However, this remains a challenge for many surgeons. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using the intraoperative fluoroscopic iliopubic tangential angle (IPTA) to determine the valgus angles of acetabular prostheses.
methodsIn the first stage, the IPTA and valgus angles of native acetabula were defined and measured in 102 THAs obtained from the picture archiving and communication systems of our hospital. Obturator foramen morphology was also measured and divided into groups according to the axial length ratio. Correlations between obturator foramen morphology and IPTA and valgus angles of native acetabula were then determined. In the second stage, angular differences (angle θ) between the IPTA and valgus angles of native acetabula were measured during unilateral THA in 136 patients to determine whether this is a stable value that could be used as a reference for placement of acetabular prostheses. Postoperative data such as Harris Hip Score (HHS) scores and complications were collected and evaluated.
resultsThe average IPTA at the apex of the true acetabulum was 58.8° ± 4.1°. The average valgus angle of native acetabula was 43.1° ± 3.9° and angle θ was 15.7° ± 1.3°. Obturator foramen morphology was divided into five groups according to the axial length ratio. IPTA was closely related to obturator foramen morphology (Pearson r = 0.489, P ≈ 0.000). Angle θ was stable and independent of obturator foramen morphology. When the IPTA and angle θ were used as references for placing acetabular prostheses in 136 THAs, the average postoperative valgus angles of acetabular prostheses was 45.13° ± 4.07° and the good-to-excellent rate was 97.05%. There were no short-term complications such as fracture, dislocation or infection. The average HHS score 6 months after surgery was 37.2 higher than the preoperative score, this difference being significant (P < 0.01). Neither infection nor dislocation was found 6 months after surgery.
conclusionsThe IPTA (at the apex of the true acetabulum) and angle θ (obtained by intraoperative fluoroscopy) are consistent in determining the postoperative valgus angle of acetabular prosthesis during THA. Thus, IPTA and angle θ are of value in guiding placement of acetabular prostheses; in particular, this method can facilitate the learning of young surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.