Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27627621›Full record

ReviewMolecular reproduction and development2016

How computational models contribute to our understanding of the germ line.

Kathryn Atwell, Sara-Jane Dunn, James M Osborne, Hillel Kugler, E Jane Albert Hubbard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular reproduction and development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathryn AtwellComputational Biology Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sara-Jane DunnBiological Computation, Microsoft Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
James M OsborneSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Hillel KuglerBiological Computation, Microsoft Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
E Jane Albert HubbardSkirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Cell Biology, and Kimmel Center for Stem Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.

Funding

CONTROL ONSET OF MEIOSIS IN C. ELEGANSR01GM061706 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HUBBARD, E. JANE ALBERT · 2000 to 2018
$5.4M
" TGF-beta and sensory regulation of germline development in C. elegans".R01GM102254 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HUBBARD, E. JANE ALBERT · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
Germline Stem Cell Analysis ToolsR03HD084660 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HUBBARD, E. JANE ALBERT · 2015 to 2016
$169k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD084660NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061706NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models are an invaluable tool in modern biology. They provide a framework within which to summarize existing knowledge, enable competing hypotheses to be compared qualitatively and quantitatively, and to facilitate the interpretation of complex data. Moreover, models allow questions to be investigated that are difficult to approach experimentally. Theories can be tested in context, identifying the gaps in our understanding and potentially leading to new hypotheses. Models can be developed on a variety of scales and with different levels of mechanistic detail, depending on the available data, the biological questions of interest, and the available mathematical and computational tools. The goal of this review is to provide a broad picture of how modeling has been applied to reproductive biology. Specifically, we look at four uses of modeling: (i) comparing hypotheses; (ii) interpreting data; (iii) exploring experimentally challenging questions; and (iv) hypothesis evaluation and generation. We present examples of each of these applications in reproductive biology, drawing from a range of organisms-including Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans, mouse, and humans. We aim to describe the data and techniques used to construct each model, and to highlight the benefits of modeling to the field, as complementary to experimental work. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 83: 944-957, 2016 © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalAnimalsGerm CellsHumansReproduction

Identifiers

PMID27627621
PMCPMC5568140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.