Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27627050›Full record

ArticleCancer science2016

Phase I study of nintedanib in Japanese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and liver impairment.

Takuji Okusaka, Taiga Otsuka, Hideki Ueno, Shuichi Mitsunaga, Rie Sugimoto, Kei Muro, Isao Saito, Yusuke Tadayasu, Kohei Inoue, Arsene-Bienvenu Loembé and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01594125 (An Open Label, Dose Escalation Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Continuous Twice-daily Oral Treatment of Nintedanib in Japanese Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01594125 phase1completednot on this map

An Open Label, Dose Escalation Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Continuous Twice-daily Oral Treatment of Nintedanib in Japanese Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2012 to 2015Enrolled30ConditionsCarcinoma, HepatocellularArmsNintedanib high dose, Nintedanib low dose, Nintedanib medium dose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Takuji OkusakaNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Taiga OtsukaSaga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.
Hideki UenoNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuichi MitsunagaNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Rie SugimotoNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kei MuroAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Isao SaitoNippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke TadayasuNippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Kobe, Japan.
Kohei InoueEPS Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Arsene-Bienvenu LoembéBoehringer Ingelheim, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Masafumi IkedaNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This phase I, dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetics of nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and mild/moderate liver impairment. Thirty patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled to groups, depending on whether liver impairment was mild (group I, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase ≤2× upper limit of normal and Child-Pugh score 5 [n = 14] or 6 [n = 2]) or moderate (group II, Child-Pugh score 5-6 and aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase >2× to ≤5× upper limit of normal [n = 7] or Child-Pugh score 7 [n = 7]); 22 patients had prior sorafenib treatment. Nintedanib was given twice daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events, starting at 150 mg (group I) or 100 mg (group II) and escalating to 200 mg. The primary objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose based on occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1 (grade ≥3 non-hematological and grade 4 hematological adverse events). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported during cycle 1 and the maximum tolerated dose for both groups was 200 mg twice daily. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite). No patients discontinued nintedanib due to adverse events; 31% of group I and 21% of group II had dose reductions. Median time to progression was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval, 1.05-5.52) for group I and 3.2 months (95% confidence interval, 0.95-6.70) for group II. Nintedanib showed a manageable safety profile and efficacy signals, including in patients previously treated with sorafenib. Clinical trial registration NCT01594125; 1199.120 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansIndolesLiver Function TestsLiver NeoplasmsMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorIndolesnintedanibHepatocellular carcinomaJapanesemaximum tolerated dosenintedanibphase I

Identifiers

PMID27627050
PMCPMC5198968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.