Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27626952›Full record

ArticleRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva2016

Evaluation of the five-year operation period of a rapid response team led by an intensive care physician at a university hospital.

Ana Luiza Mezzaroba, Marcos Toshiyuki Tanita, Josiane Festti, Claudia Maria Dantas de Maio Carrilho, Lucienne Tibery Queiroz Cardoso, Cintia Magalhães Carvalho Grion

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Weekend Mortality in an Italian Hospital: Immediate versus Delayed Bedside Critical Care Treatment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Luiza MezzarobaUniversidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Marcos Toshiyuki TanitaUniversidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Josiane FesttiUniversidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Claudia Maria Dantas de Maio CarrilhoUniversidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Lucienne Tibery Queiroz CardosoUniversidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Cintia Magalhães Carvalho GrionUniversidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the implementation of a multidisciplinary rapid response team led by an intensive care physician at a university hospital.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed assessment forms that were completed during the assessments made by the rapid response team of a university hospital between March 2009 and February 2014.

resultsData were collected from 1,628 assessments performed by the rapid response team for 1,024 patients and included 1,423 code yellow events and 205 code blue events. The number of assessments was higher in the first year of operation of the rapid response team. The multivariate analysis indicated that age (OR 1.02; 95%CI 1.02 - 1.03; p < 0.001), being male (OR 1.48; 95%CI 1.09 - 2.01; p = 0.01), having more than one assessment (OR 3.31; 95%CI, 2.32 - 4.71; p < 0.001), hospitalization for clinical care (OR 1.77; 95%CI 1.29 - 2.42; p < 0.001), the request of admission to the intensive care unit after the code event (OR 4.75; 95%CI 3.43 - 6.59; p < 0.001), and admission to the intensive care unit before the code event (OR 2.13; 95%CI 1.41 - 3.21; p = 0.001) were risk factors for hospital mortality in patients who were seen for code yellow events.

conclusionThe hospital mortality rates were higher than those found in previous studies. The number of assessments was higher in the first year of operation of the rapid response team. Moreover, hospital mortality was higher among patients admitted for clinical care.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHospital Rapid Response TeamHospitals, UniversityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID27626952
PMCPMC5051186
OpenAlexW2528434178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.