ArticleNature2016
Acetylation-regulated interaction between p53 and SET reveals a widespread regulatory mode.
Article in Nature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
133 citing papers in PubMed, 191 citations in OpenAlex.
- TP53-META, a meta-analysis tool for comparative transcriptomics of TP53 dependency: examples from target silencing and liver fibrosis.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- The disulfonic acid ANDS disrupts ANP32B-p53 interaction to suppress chronic myeloid leukemia.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Anticancer agent FTY720 upregulates cell cycle regulator BTG2 via the SET/TAF-Iβ -PP2A-SMAD3 signaling pathway and induces G2/M arrest in leukemia.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Distinct roles for SETα and SETβ in early cell fate decisions.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Accurate prediction of candidate lncRNAs associated with DNA damage response based on gene expression patterns from graph neural networks.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- MAOB promotes ROS-mediated DNA damage, triggering a cyclic MAOB-HNF1A-53BP1-p53 axis that suppresses the malignancy of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Redox biology · 2025Article
- Tandem Allosteric Effects of Reactant and Product that Promote Deacetylation Cycles in Sir2.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- NUP214 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cells · 2025Review
- Valemetostat-SAHA-Driven Acetylation of p53 via SET/TAF-Iβ Displacement and p300 Activation Modulates Cell Cycle Regulators in Pancreatic Cancer Cells.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- The PURB-HOTAIR complex regulates p53-dependent promoter-specific transcriptional activation.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025Article
- OICR-41103 as a chemical probe for the DCAF1 WD40 domain.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Opto-p53: A light-controllable activation of p53 signaling pathway.Cell structure and function · 2025Article
- The oncoprotein SET promotes serine-derived one-carbon metabolism by regulating SHMT2 enzymatic activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Age-related p53 SUMOylation accelerates senescence and tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease.Cell death and differentiation · 2025Article
- Reciprocal and non-reciprocal effects of clinically relevant SETBP1 protein dosage changes.Human molecular genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- PDHX acetylation facilitates tumor progression by disrupting PDC assembly and activating lactylation-mediated gene expression.Protein & cell · 2025Article
- The CDK4/6 Inhibitor Palbociclib Induces Cell Senescence of High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Through Acetylation of p53.Biochemical genetics · 2024Article
- Unraveling the Guardian: p53's Multifaceted Role in the DNA Damage Response and Tumor Treatment Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Although lysine acetylation is now recognized as a general protein modification for both histones and non-histone proteins, the mechanisms of acetylation-mediated actions are not completely understood. Acetylation of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of p53 (also known as TP53) was an early example of non-histone protein acetylation and its precise role remains unclear. Lysine acetylation often creates binding sites for bromodomain-containing 'reader' proteins. Here we use a proteomic screen to identify the oncoprotein SET as a major cellular factor whose binding with p53 is dependent on CTD acetylation status. SET profoundly inhibits p53 transcriptional activity in unstressed cells, but SET-mediated repression is abolished by stress-induced acetylation of p53 CTD. Moreover, loss of the interaction with SET activates p53, resulting in tumour regression in mouse xenograft models. Notably, the acidic domain of SET acts as a 'reader' for the unacetylated CTD of p53 and this mechanism of acetylation-dependent regulation is widespread in nature. For example, acetylation of p53 also modulates its interactions with similar acidic domains found in other p53 regulators including VPRBP (also known as DCAF1), DAXX and PELP1 (refs. 7, 8, 9), and computational analysis of the proteome has identified numerous proteins with the potential to serve as acidic domain readers and lysine-rich ligands. Unlike bromodomain readers, which preferentially bind the acetylated forms of their cognate ligands, the acidic domain readers specifically recognize the unacetylated forms of their ligands. Finally, the acetylation-dependent regulation of p53 was further validated in vivo by using a knock-in mouse model expressing an acetylation-mimicking form of p53. These results reveal that acidic-domain-containing factors act as a class of acetylation-dependent regulators by targeting p53 and, potentially, other proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.