Asking the Right Questions: Research of Consequence to Solve Problems of Significance.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Shaping science: Scholarly motivation and research outcomes in NIH-HEAL funded studies.PloS one · 2026
   Article
2. Clinical research mentorship programme (CRMP) for radiation oncology residents in Africa-building capacity through mentoring.Ecancermedicalscience · 2021
   Article
3. Leveraging Public Health Research to Inform State Legislative Policy that Promotes Health for Children and Families.Maternal and child health journal · 2019
   Article
4. Public Health Without Fear of Consequences or Inconsequences.American journal of public health · 2017
   Article
5. A Public Health of Consequence: Review of the October 2016 Issue of AJPH.American journal of public health · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  A Public Health of Consequence: Review of the October 2016 Issue of AJPH.2016

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as