Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27625682›Full record

ReviewPostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2016

Conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures - predictors and management.

Krzysztof Wilczek, Rafał Reguła, Kamil Bujak, Piotr Chodór, Michał Długaszek, Mariusz Gąsior

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krzysztof Wilczek3 Chair and Department of Cardiology, SMDZ in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Rafał Reguła3 Chair and Department of Cardiology, SMDZ in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Kamil Bujak3 Chair and Department of Cardiology, SMDZ in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Piotr ChodórDepartment of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, SMDZ in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Michał Długaszek3 Chair and Department of Cardiology, SMDZ in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Mariusz Gąsior3 Chair and Department of Cardiology, SMDZ in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PLSilesian Center for Heart Disease · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a safe and efficient alternative to cardiac surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis. In many countries the number of performed TAVI procedures equals the number of surgical implantations. Indications for TAVI are becoming more liberal, allowing a wider spectrum of patients to benefit from the advantages of transcatheter therapy. Due to its invasive nature, TAVI is associated with some complications such as conduction disturbances. Although these disturbances are usually not lethal, they have a great influence on patients' state and long term-survival. The most relevant and common are His' bundle branch blocks, atrioventricular blocks, and need for permanent pacemaker implantation. With the frequency at 10% to even 50%, conduction abnormalities are among the most important TAVI-related adverse events. Risk factors for conduction disturbances include age, anatomy of the heart, periprocedural factors, type of implanted valve, and comorbidities. Severity of occurring complications varies; therefore selection of a proper treatment approach is required. Considered as the most effective management, permanent pacemaker implantation turned out to negatively influence both recovery and survival. Moreover, there is no expert consensus on use of resynchronization therapy after TAVI. In this paper, the authors present a comprehensive analysis of the most common conduction disturbances accompanying TAVI, factors related to their occurrence, and treatment approach.

Indexed as

complicationsconduction disturbancespermanent pacemaker implantationtranscatheter aortic valve implantation

Identifiers

PMID27625682
PMCPMC5011535
OpenAlexW2522302078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.