Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27624768›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2018

[Therapeutic drug monitoring and individual dosing of antibiotics during sepsis : Modern or just "trendy"?]

A Brinkmann, A C Röhr, A Köberer, T Fuchs, J Preisenberger, W A Krüger, O R Frey

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. [Pharmacotherapy and kidney dysfunction].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A BrinkmannKlinik für Anästhesie, operative Intensivmedizin und spezielle Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Heidenheim, Schlosshaustraße 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Deutschland. Alexander.Brinkmann@kliniken-heidenheim.de.
A C RöhrApotheke, Klinikum Heidenheim, Heidenheim, Deutschland.
A KöbererKlinik für Anästhesie, operative Intensivmedizin und spezielle Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Heidenheim, Schlosshaustraße 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Deutschland.
T FuchsKlinik für Anästhesie, operative Intensivmedizin und spezielle Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Heidenheim, Schlosshaustraße 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Deutschland.
J PreisenbergerApotheke, Klinikum Heidenheim, Heidenheim, Deutschland.
W A KrügerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Konstanz, Konstanz, Deutschland.
O R FreyApotheke, Klinikum Heidenheim, Heidenheim, Deutschland.
Siloah St. Trudpert Klinikum · DEKlinikum Konstanz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic variability of anti-infective drugs due to pathophysiological changes by severe sepsis and septic shock is a well-known problem for critically ill patients resulting in suboptimal serum and most likely tissue concentrations of these agents.To cover a wide range of potential pathogens, high concentrations of broad spectrum anti-infectives have to reach the site of infection. Microbiological susceptibility testing (susceptible, intermediate, resistant) don't take the pharmacokinetic variability into account and are based on data generated by non-critically ill patients. But inter-patient variability in distribution and elimination of anti-infective drugs in ICU patients is extremely high and also highly unpredictable. Drug clearance of mainly renally eliminated drugs and thus the required dose can differ up to 10-fold due to the variability in renal function in patients with severe infections. To assure a timely and adequate anti-infective regime, individual dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) seem to be appropriate tools in the setting of pathophysiological changes in pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmakodynamics (PD) due to severe sepsis. In the case of known minimal inhibitory concentration, PK/PD indices (time or peak concentration dependent activity) and measured serum level can provide an optimal target concentration for the individual drug and patient.Modern anti-infective management for ICU patients includes more than the choice of drug and prompt application. Individual dosing, optimized prolonged infusion time and TDM give way to new and promising opportunities in infection control.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug MonitoringSepsisShock, SepticHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntiinfektive drugsIntensive care medicineSeptic shockSevere sepsisTherapeutic drug monitoringβ-lactam-antibiotics

Identifiers

PMID27624768
OpenAlexW2521495977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.