ArticleBMC genomics2016
Exome genotyping, linkage disequilibrium and population structure in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.).
Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Constitutive and inducible oleoresin defenses share genetic architectures and mechanisms in Pinus taeda.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Natural selection and recombination interact to structure genome-wide variation in pines.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Study of the Genetic Mechanisms of Siberian Stone Pine (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Association mapping and candidate gene identification for yield traits in European hazelnut (Plant direct · 2024Article
- Epigenetic stress memory in gymnosperms.Plant physiology · 2024Review
- Comparison of ddRADseq and EUChip60K SNP genotyping systems for population genetics and genomic selection inFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Organ-Specific Profiling of Douglas Fir (Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Applying molecular and genetic methods to trees and their fungal communities.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Genome-Wide SNP Markers Accelerate Perennial Forest Tree Breeding Rate for Disease Resistance through Marker-Assisted and Genome-Wide Selection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Haploid, diploid, and pooled exome capture recapitulate features of biology and paralogy in two non-model tree species.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
- Achievements and Challenges of Genomics-Assisted Breeding in Forest Trees: From Marker-Assisted Selection to Genome Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Toward genomic selection inApplications in plant sciences · 2021Article
- Genome-wide shifts in climate-related variation underpin responses to selective breeding in a widespread conifer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Breeding for Climate Change Resilience: A Case Study of Loblolly Pine (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Extensive Variation in Drought-Induced Gene Expression Changes Between Loblolly Pine Genotypes.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Comparative Study of Pine Reference Genomes Reveals Transposable Element Interconnected Gene Networks.Genes · 2020Article
- Genomics of Clinal Local Adaptation inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- 275 years of forestry meets genomics inEvolutionary applications · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLoblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) is one of the most widely planted and commercially important forest tree species in the USA and worldwide, and is an object of intense genomic research. However, whole genome resequencing in loblolly pine is hampered by its large size and complexity and a lack of a good reference. As a valid and more feasible alternative, entire exome sequencing was hence employed to identify the gene-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and to genotype the sampled trees.
resultsThe exons were captured in the ADEPT2 association mapping population of 375 clonally-propagated loblolly pine trees using NimbleGen oligonucleotide hybridization probes, and then exome-enriched genomic DNA fragments were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Oligonucleotide probes were designed based on 199,723 exons (≈49 Mbp) partitioned from the loblolly pine reference genome (PineRefSeq v. 1.01). The probes covered 90.2 % of the target regions. Capture efficiency was high; on average, 67 % of the sequence reads generated for each tree could be mapped to the capture target regions, and more than 70 % of the captured target bases had at least 10X sequencing depth per tree. A total of 972,720 high quality SNPs were identified after filtering. Among them, 53 % were located in coding regions (CDS), 5 % in 5' or 3' untranslated regions (UTRs) and 42 % in non-target and non-coding regions, such as introns and adjacent intergenic regions collaterally captured. We found that linkage disequilibrium (LD) decayed very rapidly, with the correlation coefficient (r (2)) between pairs of SNPs linked within single scaffolds decaying to half maximum (r (2) = 0.22) within 55 bp, to r (2) = 0.1 within 192 bp, and to r (2) = 0.05 within 451 bp. Population structure analysis using unlinked SNPs demonstrated the presence of two main distinct clusters representing western and eastern parts of the loblolly pine range included in our sample of trees.
conclusionsThe obtained results demonstrated the efficiency of exome capture for genotyping species such as loblolly pine with a large and complex genome. The highly diverse genetic variation reported in this study will be a valuable resource for future genetic and genomic research in loblolly pine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.