Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27624173›Full record

Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2017

Intravitreal Diclofenac plus Bevacizumab versus Bevacizumab alone in treatment-naive diabetic macular edema: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Heshmatollah Ghanbari, Farzan Kianersi, Seyed Ali Sonbolestan, Mohammad-Ali Abtahi, Mojataba Akbari, Zahra-Alsadat Abtahi, Seyed-Hossein Abtahi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heshmatollah GhanbariIsfahan Eye Research Center (IERC), Feiz Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Farzan KianersiIsfahan Eye Research Center (IERC), Feiz Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Seyed Ali SonbolestanIsfahan Eye Research Center (IERC), Feiz Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. sonbolestan_ali@yahoo.com.
Mohammad-Ali AbtahiIsfahan Eye Research Center (IERC), Feiz Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mojataba AkbariDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Health and Nutrition, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Zahra-Alsadat AbtahiIsfahan Eye Research Center (IERC), Feiz Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Seyed-Hossein AbtahiIsfahan Eye Research Center (IERC), Feiz Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the short-term effects of a single intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg Bevacizumab combined with 300 lg/0.1 mL Diclofenac (IVB/D) versus 1.25 mg intravitreal Bevacizumab (IVB) alone in the treatment of naive diabetic macular edema (DME). In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 80 eyes were included in the final analysis; 42 and 38 of which in the IVB and IVB/D groups, respectively. The primary outcome measure was a change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR at week 4. The secondary outcomes included changes in central macular thickness (CMT), macular volume, and potential injection-related complications. Significant improvement of BCVA was demonstrated in both study arms (mean reductions in LogMAR: -0.088 ± 0.278, -0.228 ± 0.330 for IVB and IVB/D, respectively). The difference in BCVA changes was in favor of IVB/D; however, not to a statistically significant level (P = 0.160). Significant reduction of CMT was documented in both study arms (mean reductions: 82.43 ± 160.09 and 153.26 ± 163.85 for IVB and IVB + IVD, respectively). Comparison of CMT changes between groups showed that IVB/D reduced CMT more than that of IVB (P = 0.04). Effects on macular volume corresponded to those of CMT. No injection-related complications or significant alterations in intraocular pressure were observed in any of the study arms. In treatment-naive DME, superiority of IVB/D combination therapy over IVB monotherapy may exist; especially as regards anatomical features. In our therapeutic arsenal for DME, IVD can be added as an adjunct to Bevacizumab.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBevacizumabDiabetic RetinopathyDiclofenacDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMacula LuteaMacular EdemaMaleAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBevacizumabDiclofenacBevacizumabDiabetic macular edemaDiabetic RetinopathyDiclofenacIntravitreal injectionNSAIDs

Identifiers

PMID27624173
OpenAlexW2518786097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.