SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016
Hyperglycaemia and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06064669 (Effect of Metformin on Healthy Live Birth After In-vitro Fertilization in Women With Prediabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 216 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Metformin on Healthy Live Birth After In-vitro Fertilization in Women With Prediabetes Mellitus: a Multicenter Double-blind Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial
Who cites it
216 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Relationship Between Improvements in Glycemic Control and Risk of Pregnancy Complications in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Metaregression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Intensive Glucose Management.Journal of diabetes research · 2025Pooled it
- Doppler Indices of the Uterine, Umbilical and Fetal Middle Cerebral Artery in Diabetic versus Non-Diabetic Pregnancy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Pooled it
- Diabetes and anti-diabetic interventions and the risk of gynaecological and obstetric morbidity: an umbrella review of the literature.BMC medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of gestational diabetes mellitus highlights genetic links with type 2 diabetes.Human molecular genetics · 2022Pooled it
- Environmental health influences in pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2022Pooled it
- Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022 · on this mapPooled it
- Barriers to screening, diagnosis and management of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy in Africa: a systematic review.International health · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Lifestyle Interventions for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2022Pooled it
- Is serum zinc status related to gestational diabetes mellitus? A meta-analysis.Maternal & child nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Risk of developing metabolic syndrome after gestational diabetes mellitus - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2021Pooled it
- Maternal diabetes and risk of childhood malignancies in the offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Acta diabetologica · 2021Pooled it
- Vitamin B12 and Folate Levels During Pregnancy and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Plasma Levels of Free Fatty Acids in Women with Gestational Diabetes and Its Intrinsic and Extrinsic Determinants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of diabetes research · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in gestational diabetes mellitus: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Influence of maternal obesity on the association between common pregnancy complications and risk of childhood obesity: an individual participant data meta-analysis.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2018Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of a Telemedicine System in Patients With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (TELEGLAM): Single-Center, 2-Arm, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Trial
- Predictive value of OGTT parameters and clinical markers in gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective randomized controlled trial from a tertiary center in Türkiye.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Trial
- Usability Acceptability and Satisfaction of a New Mobile Intervention among Nepalese Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-sectional Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Trial
- Identifying psychosocial predictors and developing a risk score for preterm birth among Kenyan pregnant women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Trial
- Associations of body composition and physical fitness with gestational diabetes and cardiovascular health in pregnancy: Results from the HealthyMoms trial.Nutrition & diabetes · 2021Trial
156 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the association between maternal glucose concentrations and adverse perinatal outcomes in women without gestational or existing diabetes and to determine whether clear thresholds for identifying women at risk of perinatal outcomes can be identified.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies and control arms of randomised trials. DATA SOURCES: Databases including Medline and Embase were searched up to October 2014 and combined with individual participant data from two additional birth cohorts. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Studies including pregnant women with oral glucose tolerance (OGTT) or challenge (OGCT) test results, with data on at least one adverse perinatal outcome. APPRAISAL AND DATA EXTRACTION: Glucose test results were extracted for OGCT (50 g) and OGTT (75 g and 100 g) at fasting and one and two hour post-load timings. Data were extracted on induction of labour; caesarean and instrumental delivery; pregnancy induced hypertension; pre-eclampsia; macrosomia; large for gestational age; preterm birth; birth injury; and neonatal hypoglycaemia. Risk of bias was assessed with a modified version of the critical appraisal skills programme and quality in prognostic studies tools.
results25 reports from 23 published studies and two individual participant data cohorts were included, with up to 207 172 women (numbers varied by the test and outcome analysed in the meta-analyses). Overall most studies were judged as having a low risk of bias. There were positive linear associations with caesarean section, induction of labour, large for gestational age, macrosomia, and shoulder dystocia for all glucose exposures across the distribution of glucose concentrations. There was no clear evidence of a threshold effect. In general, associations were stronger for fasting concentration than for post-load concentration. For example, the odds ratios for large for gestational age per 1 mmol/L increase of fasting and two hour post-load glucose concentrations (after a 75 g OGTT) were 2.15 (95% confidence interval 1.60 to 2.91) and 1.20 (1.13 to 1.28), respectively. Heterogeneity was low between studies in all analyses.
conclusionsThis review and meta-analysis identified a large number of studies in various countries. There was a graded linear association between fasting and post-load glucose concentration across the whole glucose distribution and most adverse perinatal outcomes in women without pre-existing or gestational diabetes. The lack of a clear threshold at which risk increases means that decisions regarding thresholds for diagnosing gestational diabetes are somewhat arbitrary. Research should now investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of applying different glucose thresholds for diagnosis of gestational diabetes on perinatal and longer term outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42013004608.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.