ArticleEndocrine2017
Proposal for a novel management of indeterminate thyroid nodules on the basis of cytopathological subclasses.
Article in Endocrine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Molecular Variants and Their Risks for Malignancy in Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2019Pooled it
- Ultrasound characteristics of thyroid nodules facilitate interpretation of the malignant risk of Bethesda system III/IV thyroid nodules and inform therapeutic schedule.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2019Pooled it
- Combination of ultrasound and molecular testing in malignancy risk estimate of Bethesda category IV thyroid nodules: results from a single-institution prospective study.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2021Article
- Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: AsianGland surgery · 2020Review
- Molecular markers for the classification of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2020Review
- Article
- The Usefulness of Immunocytochemistry of CD56 in Determining Malignancy from Indeterminate Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indeterminate thyroid nodules include heterogeneous lesions that could benefit from a differential management. Our aim is to better define the management of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology class III and IV nodules, by identifying cytological subcategories among Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology class III associated with different clinical risk, by means of ultrasound, repeated FNAB, and BRAFV600E molecular analysis. We also evaluated the outcome of nodules not operated, over a 5-year follow-up. Out of 460 nodules (269 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology class III and 191 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology class IV), 344 were operated on surgical group and 116 followed-up conservatively (follow-up group). Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology class III was divided into four subcategories on the basis of cytomorphological features (III-1, III-2, III-3, III-4). Clinical risk was defined on the basis of histological, cytological, and ultrasound data. Malignancy was higher in Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology class III vs. Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology class IV (34.4 vs. 26.2 %; p < 0.01). Papillary thyroid carcinoma was the most frequent cancer in each Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology class (35 %). BRAFV600E diagnostic accuracy was 87 %. Repeated FNAB reclassified as benign nearly 40 % of nodules, selecting patients where surgery could be spared. Significant nodule growth occurred in 13.7 % of nodules, belonging mostly to Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology class III-2 and Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology class IV. Overall clinical risk was higher in Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology III-1, III-4, and IV classes. We propose a differential management of Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology III and IV classes and related subcategories: surgery may be indicated in Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology class III-1, III-4, and IV; a conservative follow-up avoiding repeated FNAB may be appropriated in class III-3, while repeated FNAB may be useful in class III-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27623969What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.