Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27623947›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2016

Investigation of gene-diet interactions in the incretin system and risk of type 2 diabetes: the EPIC-InterAct study.

InterAct Consortium

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Associations ofJournal of diabetes research · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Gene-lifestyle interaction on risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Role of Nutrition in the Prevention and Intervention of Type 2 Diabetes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Gene-lifestyle interplay in type 2 diabetes.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Gene-Diet Interactions in Type 2 Diabetes: The Chicken and Egg Debate.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

InterAct Consortium

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThe gut incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) have a major role in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Specific genetic and dietary factors have been found to influence the release and action of incretins. We examined the effect of interactions between seven incretin-related genetic variants in GIPR, KCNQ1, TCF7L2 and WFS1 and dietary components (whey-containing dairy, cereal fibre, coffee and olive oil) on the risk of type 2 diabetes in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-InterAct study.

methodsThe current case-cohort study included 8086 incident type 2 diabetes cases and a representative subcohort of 11,035 participants (median follow-up: 12.5 years). Prentice-weighted Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to investigate the associations and interactions between the dietary factors and genes in relation to the risk of type 2 diabetes.

resultsAn interaction (p = 0.048) between TCF7L2 variants and coffee intake was apparent, with an inverse association between coffee and type 2 diabetes present among carriers of the diabetes risk allele (T) in rs12255372 (GG: HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.97, 1.02] per cup of coffee; GT: HR 0.96 [95% CI 0.93, 0.98]); and TT: HR 0.93 [95% CI 0.88, 0.98]). In addition, an interaction (p = 0.005) between an incretin-specific genetic risk score and coffee was observed, again with a stronger inverse association with coffee in carriers with more risk alleles (0-3 risk alleles: HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.94, 1.04]; 7-10 risk alleles: HR 0.95 [95% CI 0.90, 0.99]). None of these associations were statistically significant after correction for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationOur large-scale case-cohort study provides some evidence for a possible interaction of TCF7L2 variants and an incretin-specific genetic risk score with coffee consumption in relation to the risk of type 2 diabetes. Further large-scale studies and/or meta-analyses are needed to confirm these interactions in other populations.

Indexed as

DietAllelesCase-Control StudiesCoffeeDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dietary FiberFemaleGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideHumansIncretinsKCNQ1 Potassium ChannelMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedOlive OilProportional Hazards ModelsCoffeeDietary FiberGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideIncretinsKCNQ1 Potassium ChannelKCNQ1 protein, humanMembrane ProteinsOlive OilTranscription Factor 7-Like 2 Proteinwolframin proteinCoffeeDairyFibreGene–environment interactionGIPRIncretinsKCNQ1Olive oilTCF7L2WFS1

Identifiers

PMID27623947
PMCPMC6518069
OpenAlexW2588923237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.