ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
NBLDA: negative binomial linear discriminant analysis for RNA-Seq data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative transcriptomic and machine learning analysis identifies key genes and immune dysregulation in goats exposed to peste des petits ruminants virus.Virus genes · 2025Article
- Sparse Semiparametric Discriminant Analysis for High-dimensional Zero-inflated Data.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2025Article
- TabDEG: Classifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data based on feature extraction and deep learning framework.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Finite mixtures of matrix variate Poisson-log normal distributions for three-way count data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- scDLC: a deep learning framework to classify large sample single-cell RNA-seq data.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Article
- Joint Modeling of RNAseq and Radiomics Data for Glioma Molecular Characterization and Prediction.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Selecting Classification Methods for Small Samples of Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- SINC: a scale-invariant deep-neural-network classifier for bulk and single-cell RNA-seq data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Article
- Naught all zeros in sequence count data are the same.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- qtQDA: quantile transformed quadratic discriminant analysis for high-dimensional RNA-seq data.PeerJ · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) has become a powerful technology to characterize gene expression profiles because it is more accurate and comprehensive than microarrays. Although statistical methods that have been developed for microarray data can be applied to RNA-Seq data, they are not ideal due to the discrete nature of RNA-Seq data. The Poisson distribution and negative binomial distribution are commonly used to model count data. Recently, Witten (Annals Appl Stat 5:2493-2518, 2011) proposed a Poisson linear discriminant analysis for RNA-Seq data. The Poisson assumption may not be as appropriate as the negative binomial distribution when biological replicates are available and in the presence of overdispersion (i.e., when the variance is larger than or equal to the mean). However, it is more complicated to model negative binomial variables because they involve a dispersion parameter that needs to be estimated.
resultsIn this paper, we propose a negative binomial linear discriminant analysis for RNA-Seq data. By Bayes' rule, we construct the classifier by fitting a negative binomial model, and propose some plug-in rules to estimate the unknown parameters in the classifier. The relationship between the negative binomial classifier and the Poisson classifier is explored, with a numerical investigation of the impact of dispersion on the discriminant score. Simulation results show the superiority of our proposed method. We also analyze two real RNA-Seq data sets to demonstrate the advantages of our method in real-world applications.
conclusionsWe have developed a new classifier using the negative binomial model for RNA-seq data classification. Our simulation results show that our proposed classifier has a better performance than existing works. The proposed classifier can serve as an effective tool for classifying RNA-seq data. Based on the comparison results, we have provided some guidelines for scientists to decide which method should be used in the discriminant analysis of RNA-Seq data. R code is available at http://www.comp.hkbu.edu.hk/~xwan/NBLDA.R or https://github.com/yangchadam/NBLDA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.