Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27623763›Full record

SynthesisApplied clinical informatics2016

Healthcare Applications of Smart Watches. A Systematic Review.

Tsung-Chien Lu, Chia-Ming Fu, Matthew Huei-Ming Ma, Cheng-Chung Fang, Anne M Turner

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Applied clinical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04379921 (Improving Spine Surgical Care With Real-Time Objective Patient Tracking Using the Apple Watch), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04379921 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Improving Spine Surgical Care With Real-Time Objective Patient Tracking Using the Apple Watch

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2020 to 2024Enrolled255ConditionsSpine Disease, Spine Degeneration, Spinal Stenosis, SurgeryArmsApple Watch and App
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Scrybe: A Secure Audit Trail for Clinical Trial Data Fusion.Digital threats : research and practice · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tsung-Chien Lu
Chia-Ming Fu
Matthew Huei-Ming Ma
Cheng-Chung Fang
Anne M TurnerAnne M. Turner, MD, MLIS, MPH, University of Washington, Northwest Center for Public Health Practice, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 400, Seattle, WA 98105, TEL: 206-221-3615, Email: amturner@uw.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this systematic review is to synthesize research studies involving the use of smart watch devices for healthcare. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was chosen as the systematic review methodology. We searched PubMed, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, ACM, and IEEE Xplore. In order to include ongoing clinical trials, we also searched ClinicalTrials.gov. Two investigators evaluated the retrieved articles for inclusion. Discrepancies between investigators regarding article inclusion and extracted data were resolved through team discussion.

results356 articles were screened and 24 were selected for review. The most common publication venue was in conference proceedings (13, 54%). The majority of studies were published or presented in 2015 (19, 79%). We identified two registered clinical trials underway. A large proportion of the identified studies focused on applications involving health monitoring for the elderly (6, 25%). Five studies focused on patients with Parkinson's disease and one on cardiac arrest. There were no studies which reported use of usability testing before implementation. DISCUSSION: Most of the reviewed studies focused on the chronically ill elderly. There was a lack of detailed description of user-centered design or usability testing before implementation. Based on our review, the most commonly used platform in healthcare research was that of the Android Wear. The clinical application of smart watches as assistive devices deserves further attention.

conclusionSmart watches are unobtrusive and easy to wear. While smart watch technology supplied with biosensors has potential to be useful in a variety of healthcare applications, rigorous research with their use in clinical settings is needed.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldDelivery of Health CareHumansHealthcareInterfaces and usabilityOther clinical informatics applicationsSmart watchWearable device

Identifiers

PMID27623763
PMCPMC5052554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.