Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27623734›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental science & technology2016

Consumer Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative Meta-analysis of U.S. Studies.

Susanna D Mitro, Robin E Dodson, Veena Singla, Gary Adamkiewicz, Angelo F Elmi, Monica K Tilly, Ami R Zota

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental science & technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 70 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. A transdisciplinary process-oriented approach to evaluate infant exposure to indoor dust.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  9. The Role of the Indoor Exposome in Food Allergy Development.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identifying differences in U.S. exposure to ubiquitous carcinogens.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Susanna D MitroMilken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University , Washington, D.C. 20052, United States.
Robin E DodsonSilent Spring Institute , Newton, MA 02460, United States.
Veena SinglaHealth and Environment Program, Natural Resources Defense Council , San Francisco, California 94104, United States.
Gary AdamkiewiczHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Angelo F ElmiMilken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University , Washington, D.C. 20052, United States.
Monica K TillyHealth and Environment Program, Natural Resources Defense Council , San Francisco, California 94104, United States.
Ami R ZotaMilken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University , Washington, D.C. 20052, United States.
Milken Institute · USNatural Resources Defense Council · USGeorge Washington University · USHarvard University · USSilent Spring Institute · US

Funding

Role of endocrine-disrupting chemicals and social stress on perinatal outcomesR00ES019881 · NIEHS · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZOTA, AMI R · 2013 to 2015
$747k
NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES019881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor dust is a reservoir for commercial consumer product chemicals, including many compounds with known or suspected health effects. However, most dust exposure studies measure few chemicals in small samples. We systematically searched the U.S. indoor dust literature on phthalates, replacement flame retardants (RFRs), perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), synthetic fragrances, and environmental phenols and estimated pooled geometric means (GMs) and 95% confidence intervals for 45 chemicals measured in ≥3 data sets. In order to rank and contextualize these results, we used the pooled GMs to calculate residential intake from dust ingestion, inhalation, and dermal uptake from air, and then identified hazard traits from the Safer Consumer Products Candidate Chemical List. Our results indicate that U.S. indoor dust consistently contains chemicals from multiple classes. Phthalates occurred in the highest concentrations, followed by phenols, RFRs, fragrance, and PFASs. Several phthalates and RFRs had the highest residential intakes. We also found that many chemicals in dust share hazard traits such as reproductive and endocrine toxicity. We offer recommendations to maximize comparability of studies and advance indoor exposure science. This information is critical in shaping future exposure and health studies, especially related to cumulative exposures, and in providing evidence for intervention development and public policy.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorDustEnvironmental MonitoringFlame RetardantsHousingHumansDustFlame Retardants

Identifiers

PMID27623734
PMCPMC5052660
OpenAlexW2520610831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.