Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27623691›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2017

Emergency radiology and mass casualty incidents-report of a mass casualty incident at a level 1 trauma center.

Ferdia Bolster, Ken Linnau, Steve Mitchell, Eric Roberge, Quynh Nguyen, Jeffrey Robinson, Bruce Lehnert, Joel Gross

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Coronavirus Outbreak: Is Radiology Ready? Mass Casualty Incident Planning.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ferdia BolsterEmergency Radiology, Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, Univeristy of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA. ferdiabolster@hotmail.com.
Ken LinnauEmergency Radiology, Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, Univeristy of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.
Steve MitchellEmergency Radiology, Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, Univeristy of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.
Eric RobergeDepartment of Radiology, Madigan Army Medical Center, 9040A Jackson Ave, Tacoma, WA, 98431-1100, USA.
Quynh NguyenEmergency Radiology, Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, Univeristy of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.
Jeffrey RobinsonEmergency Radiology, Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, Univeristy of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.
Bruce LehnertEmergency Radiology, Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, Univeristy of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.
Joel GrossEmergency Radiology, Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, Univeristy of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.
Harborview Medical Center · USMadigan Army Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this article are to describe the events of a recent mass casualty incident (MCI) at our level 1 trauma center and to describe the radiology response to the event. We also describe the findings and recommendations of our radiology department after-action review. An MCI activation was triggered after an amphibious military vehicle, repurposed for tourist activities, carrying 37 passengers, collided with a charter bus carrying 45 passengers on a busy highway bridge in Seattle, WA, USA. There were 4 deaths at the scene, and 51 patients were transferred to local hospitals following prehospital scene triage. Nineteen patients were transferred to our level 1 trauma center. Eighteen casualties arrived within 72 min. Sixteen arrived within 1 h of the first patient arrival, and 1 casualty was transferred 3 h later having initially been assessed at another hospital. Eighteen casualties (94.7 %) underwent diagnostic imaging in the emergency department. Of these 18 casualties, 15 had a trauma series (portable chest x-ray and x-ray of pelvis). Whole-body trauma computed tomography scans (WBCT) were performed on 15 casualties (78.9 %), 12 were immediate and performed during the initial active phase of the MCI, and 3 WBCTs were delayed. The initial 12 WBCTs were completed in 101 min. The mean number of radiographic studies performed per patient was 3 (range 1-8), and the total number of injuries detected was 88. The surge in imaging requirements during an MCI can be significant and exceed normal operating capacity. This report of our radiology experience during a recent MCI and subsequent after-action review serves to provide an example of how radiology capacity and workflow functioned during an MCI, in order to provide emergency radiologists and response planners with practical recommendations for implementation in the event of a future MCI.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficMass Casualty IncidentsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultContrast MediaDisaster PlanningFemaleHumansMaleTrauma CentersTriageWashingtonWhole Body ImagingWorkflowWounds and InjuriesContrast MediaAfter action reviewEmergency radiologyMass casualty incidentMass casualty planningRadiology

Identifiers

PMID27623691
OpenAlexW2520016545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.