Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27623561›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of hematology2016

Transcranial doppler re-screening of subjects who participated in STOP and STOP II.

Robert J Adams, Dan T Lackland, Lynette Brown, David Brown, Jenifer Voeks, Heather J Fullerton, Julie Kanter, Janet L Kwiatkowski

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of hematology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert J AdamsNeurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Dan T LacklandNeurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Lynette BrownTidelands Health Cancer Service, Georgetown, SC.
David BrownNeurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Jenifer VoeksNeurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Heather J FullertonUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Julie KanterPediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Janet L KwiatkowskiChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Prevention of Stroke after STOP, A Retrospective Chart ReviewR01HL096789 · NHLBI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ADAMS, ROBERT J · 2009 to 2012
$2.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In children with Sickle Cell Disease, the combination of risk stratification with Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound (TCD) and selective chronic red cell transfusion (CRCT-the STOP Protocol) is one of the most effective stroke prevention strategies in medicine. How fully it is being implemented is unclear. Nineteen of 26 sites that conducted the two pivotal clinical trials (STOP and STOP II) participated in Post STOP, a comprehensive medical records review assessing protocol implementation in the 10-15 years since the trials ended. Professional abstractors identified medical records in the Post STOP era in 2851 (74%) of the 3,840 children who took part in STOP and/or STOP II, and documented TCD rescreening, maintenance of CRCT in those at risk, and stroke. Among 1,896 children eligible for TCD rescreening (target group), evidence of any rescreening was found in 1,090 (57%). There was wide site variation in TCD rescreening ranging from 18% to 91% of eligible children. Both younger age and having a conditional TCD during STOP/II were associated with a higher likelihood of having a TCD in Post STOP. Sixty eight new abnormal, high risk cases were identified. Despite clear evidence of benefit the STOP protocol is not fully implemented even at experienced sites. Site variation suggests that system improvements might remove barriers to implementation and result in even greater reduction of ischemic stroke in children with SCD. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1191-1194, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnemia, Sickle CellBlood Flow VelocityChildChild, PreschoolErythrocyte TransfusionGuideline AdherenceHumansMass ScreeningRisk AssessmentStrokeUltrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial

Identifiers

PMID27623561
PMCPMC5155448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.