ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2017
Predictive overbooking and active recruitment increases uptake of endoscopy appointments among African American patients.
Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01639443 (Reducing VA No-Shows), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Reducing VA No-Shows: Evaluation of Predictive Overbooking Applied to Colonoscopy
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive model-based interventions to reduce outpatient no-shows: a rapid systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Utilization of Census Tract-Based Neighborhood Poverty Rates to Predict Non-adherence to Screening Colonoscopy.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsUse of GI endoscopy is historically lower in nonwhite ethnic and racial groups compared with whites. These disparities are multifactorial but likely contribute to differences in GI clinical outcomes. We sought to improve endoscopy uptake overall and in minorities by predictive overbooking and active recruitment in a hospital-based GI clinic.
methodsFrom January to October 2014, we alternated between traditional booking for Veterans Affairs Healthcare Network patients with a physician recommendation for endoscopy and active recruitment of patients to fill projected open endoscopy appointment slots. On intervention weeks, patients attending a GI clinic were given the opportunity to "fast track" to an endoscopy appointment on short notice. During control weeks, patients were not actively recruited. We compared uptake of endoscopy appointments in both groups and performed logistic regression to determine predictors of participation in fast-track active recruitment.
resultsDuring fast-track active recruitment for endoscopy, the clinic recruited an additional 111 patients for endoscopy over passive recruitment, including 46 African Americans (41.4%). In a logistic regression model controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, African Americans were twice as likely (adjusted OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.26-3.17) than whites to participate in the fast-track option for recommended endoscopy.
conclusionsInterventions to actively recruit patients for endoscopy increased the overall percentage of GI clinic patients undergoing endoscopy and disproportionately improved endoscopy appointment uptake in African Americans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.