Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27623103›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2017

Predictive overbooking and active recruitment increases uptake of endoscopy appointments among African American patients.

Folasade P May, Mark W Reid, Samuel Cohen, Francis Dailey, Brennan M R Spiegel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01639443 (Reducing VA No-Shows), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01639443 nacompletednot on this map

Reducing VA No-Shows: Evaluation of Predictive Overbooking Applied to Colonoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2013 to 2016Enrolled180ConditionsColon CancerArmsPredictive no-show overbooking
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Predictive model-based interventions to reduce outpatient no-shows: a rapid systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Folasade P MayDepartment of Gastroenterology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA; Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mark W ReidDepartment of Gastroenterology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA; Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Samuel CohenCedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Francis DaileyCedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Brennan M R SpiegelDepartment of Gastroenterology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA; Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007180 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JENSEN, DENNIS MICHAEL · 1986 to 2025
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsUse of GI endoscopy is historically lower in nonwhite ethnic and racial groups compared with whites. These disparities are multifactorial but likely contribute to differences in GI clinical outcomes. We sought to improve endoscopy uptake overall and in minorities by predictive overbooking and active recruitment in a hospital-based GI clinic.

methodsFrom January to October 2014, we alternated between traditional booking for Veterans Affairs Healthcare Network patients with a physician recommendation for endoscopy and active recruitment of patients to fill projected open endoscopy appointment slots. On intervention weeks, patients attending a GI clinic were given the opportunity to "fast track" to an endoscopy appointment on short notice. During control weeks, patients were not actively recruited. We compared uptake of endoscopy appointments in both groups and performed logistic regression to determine predictors of participation in fast-track active recruitment.

resultsDuring fast-track active recruitment for endoscopy, the clinic recruited an additional 111 patients for endoscopy over passive recruitment, including 46 African Americans (41.4%). In a logistic regression model controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, African Americans were twice as likely (adjusted OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.26-3.17) than whites to participate in the fast-track option for recommended endoscopy.

conclusionsInterventions to actively recruit patients for endoscopy increased the overall percentage of GI clinic patients undergoing endoscopy and disproportionately improved endoscopy appointment uptake in African Americans.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesEthnicityPatient SelectionAgedAsianBlack or African AmericanColonoscopyEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansIndians, North AmericanLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNative Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

Identifiers

PMID27623103
PMCPMC5346055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.