Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27623012›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Origin of a folded repeat protein from an intrinsically disordered ancestor.

Hongbo Zhu, Edgardo Sepulveda, Marcus D Hartmann, Manjunatha Kogenaru, Astrid Ursinus, Eva Sulz, Reinhard Albrecht, Murray Coles, Jörg Martin, Andrei N Lupas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Deciphering opening mechanisms of 14-3-3 proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Creative destruction: New protein folds from old.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Emerging Roles of Gemin5: From snRNPs Assembly to Translation Control.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongbo ZhuDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Edgardo SepulvedaDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2413-8261
Marcus D HartmannDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6937-5677
Manjunatha KogenaruDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6570-7857
Astrid UrsinusDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Eva SulzDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Reinhard AlbrechtDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Murray ColesDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Jörg MartinDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Andrei N LupasDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1959-4836
Tel Aviv University · ILMax Planck Institute for Developmental Biology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive proteins are thought to have arisen through the amplification of subdomain-sized peptides. Many of these originated in a non-repetitive context as cofactors of RNA-based replication and catalysis, and required the RNA to assume their active conformation. In search of the origins of one of the most widespread repeat protein families, the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR), we identified several potential homologs of its repeated helical hairpin in non-repetitive proteins, including the putatively ancient ribosomal protein S20 (RPS20), which only becomes structured in the context of the ribosome. We evaluated the ability of the RPS20 hairpin to form a TPR fold by amplification and obtained structures identical to natural TPRs for variants with 2-5 point mutations per repeat. The mutations were neutral in the parent organism, suggesting that they could have been sampled in the course of evolution. TPRs could thus have plausibly arisen by amplification from an ancestral helical hairpin.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularProtein FoldingRibosomal ProteinsSequence Homology, Amino AcidTetratricopeptide RepeatRibosomal Proteinsribosomal protein S20amplificationancient peptidescomputational biologyprotein evolutionprotein foldingribosomal proteinsystems biologyTPR

Identifiers

PMID27623012
PMCPMC5074805
OpenAlexW2519785035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.