Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27622997›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2016

Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

F Stephen Hodi, Jason Chesney, Anna C Pavlick, Caroline Robert, Kenneth F Grossmann, David F McDermott, Gerald P Linette, Nicolas Meyer, Jeffrey K Giguere, Sanjiv S Agarwala and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06566391 (Primary Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Combo-immunotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Nivolumab in Locally Advanced or Limited Metastatic Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 490 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
490citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06566391 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Primary Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Combo-immunotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Nivolumab in Locally Advanced or Limited Metastatic Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuropean Institute of OncologyRan2019 to 2024Enrolled35ConditionsMelanomaArmsIpilimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

490 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Neoadjuvant treatment for stage III and IV cutaneous melanoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. RP1 Combined With Nivolumab in Advanced Anti-PD-1-Failed Melanoma (IGNYTE).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab in Untreated Advanced Melanoma: The Open-Label, Phase III PIVOT IO 001 Trial Results.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

430 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

F Stephen HodiDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: stephen_hodi@dfci.harvard.edu.
Jason ChesneyUniversity of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Anna C PavlickNew York University, New York, NY, USA.
Caroline RobertGustave Roussy, INSERM U981, Paris, France.
Kenneth F GrossmannHuntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
David F McDermottBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Gerald P LinetteWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Nicolas MeyerInstitut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France.
Jeffrey K GiguereGreenville Health System Cancer Institute, Greenville, SC, USA.
Sanjiv S AgarwalaSt Luke's Cancer Center and Temple University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Montaser ShaheenUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Marc S ErnstoffDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
David R MinorCalifornia Pacific Center for Melanoma Research, San Francisco, CA, USA.
April K SalamaDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Matthew H TaylorOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Patrick A OttDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Christine HorakBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Paul GagnierBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Joel JiangBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Jedd D WolchokMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Michael A PostowMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResults from phase 2 and 3 trials in patients with advanced melanoma have shown significant improvements in the proportion of patients achieving an objective response and prolonged progression-free survival with the combination of nivolumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) plus ipilimumab (an anti-CTLA-4 antibody) compared with ipilimumab alone. We report 2-year overall survival data from a randomised controlled trial assessing this treatment in previously untreated advanced melanoma.

methodsIn this multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial (CheckMate 069) we recruited patients from 19 specialist cancer centres in two countries (France and the USA). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable stage III or IV melanoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive an intravenous infusion of nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus placebo, every 3 weeks for four doses. Subsequently, patients assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whereas patients allocated to ipilimumab alone received placebo every 2 weeks during this phase. Randomisation was done via an interactive voice response system with a permuted block schedule (block size of six) and stratification by BRAF mutation status. The study funder, patients, investigators, and study site staff were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint, which has been reported previously, was the proportion of patients with BRAF

findingsBetween Sept 16, 2013, and Feb 6, 2014, we screened 179 patients and enrolled 142, randomly assigning 95 patients to nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 47 to ipilimumab alone. In each treatment group, one patient no longer met the study criteria following randomisation and thus did not receive study drug. At a median follow-up of 24·5 months (IQR 9·1-25·7), 2-year overall survival was 63·8% (95% CI 53·3-72·6) for those assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 53·6% (95% CI 38·1-66·8) for those assigned to ipilimumab alone; median overall survival had not been reached in either group (hazard ratio 0·74, 95% CI 0·43-1·26; p=0·26). Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 51 (54%) of 94 patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with nine (20%) of 46 patients who received ipilimumab alone. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were colitis (12 [13%] of 94 patients) and increased alanine aminotransferase (ten [11%]) in the combination group and diarrhoea (five [11%] of 46 patients) and hypophysitis (two [4%]) in the ipilimumab alone group. Serious grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 34 (36%) of 94 patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab (including colitis in ten [11%] of 94 patients, and diarrhoea in five [5%]) compared with four (9%) of 46 patients who received ipilimumab alone (including diarrhoea in two [4%] of 46 patients, colitis in one [2%], and hypophysitis in one [2%]). No new types of treatment-related adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred in this updated analysis.

interpretationAlthough follow-up of the patients in this study is ongoing, the results of this analysis suggest that the combination of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab might lead to improved outcomes compared with first-line ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma. The results suggest encouraging survival outcomes with immunotherapy in this population of patients.

fundingBristol-Myers Squibb.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDouble-Blind MethodHumansIpilimumabMelanomaMutationNivolumabProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAntibodies, MonoclonalBRAF protein, humanIpilimumabNivolumabProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID27622997
PMCPMC5630525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.