ArticleNeuroImage2017
Towards person-centered neuroimaging markers for resilience and vulnerability in Bipolar Disorder.
Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Risk of Bias in Neuroimaging-Based Artificial Intelligence Models for Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Towards a brain-based predictome of mental illness.Human brain mapping · 2020Pooled it
- Aberrant effective connectivity during working memory performance in schizotypal personality disorder and schizophrenia: A spectrum approach.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Working memory network dysfunction in bipolar I vs. bipolar II disorder: a systematic review of task-fMRI evidence.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Machine learning with multiple modalities of brain magnetic resonance imaging data to identify the presence of bipolar disorder.Journal of affective disorders · 2025Article
- Identifying misdiagnosed bipolar disorder using support vector machine: feature selection based on fMRI of follow-up confirmed affective disorders.Translational psychiatry · 2024Article
- Sampling inequalities affect generalization of neuroimaging-based diagnostic classifiers in psychiatry.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- An Overview of Bipolar Disorder Diagnosis Using Machine Learning Approaches: Clinical Opportunities and Challenges.Iranian journal of psychiatry · 2023Article
- The inferior frontal gyrus and familial risk for bipolar disorder.Psychoradiology · 2022Review
- The performance of artificial intelligence-driven technologies in diagnosing mental disorders: an umbrella review.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- The Role of Machine Learning in Diagnosing Bipolar Disorder: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Individualized diagnosis of major depressive disorder via multivariate pattern analysis of thalamic sMRI features.BMC psychiatry · 2021Article
- Neuroimaging correlates of emotional response-inhibition discriminate between young depressed adults with and without sub-threshold bipolar symptoms (Emotional Response-inhibition in Young Depressed Adults).Journal of affective disorders · 2021Article
- Personalized estimates of morphometric similarity in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.NPJ schizophrenia · 2020Article
- Person-based similarity in brain structure and functional connectivity in bipolar disorder.Journal of affective disorders · 2020Article
- Using Minimal-Redundant and Maximal-Relevant Whole-Brain Functional Connectivity to Classify Bipolar Disorder.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Structural Brain Alterations in Youth With Psychosis and Bipolar Spectrum Symptoms.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2019Article
- Neuroimaging Markers of Risk, Disease Expression, and Resilience to Bipolar Disorder.Current psychiatry reports · 2019Review
- Machine learning in major depression: From classification to treatment outcome prediction.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2018Review
- Resilience concepts in psychiatry demonstrated with bipolar disorder.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Improved clinical care for Bipolar Disorder (BD) relies on the identification of diagnostic markers that can reliably detect disease-related signals in clinically heterogeneous populations. At the very least, diagnostic markers should be able to differentiate patients with BD from healthy individuals and from individuals at familial risk for BD who either remain well or develop other psychopathology, most commonly Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). These issues are particularly pertinent to the development of translational applications of neuroimaging as they represent challenges for which clinical observation alone is insufficient. We therefore applied pattern classification to task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data of the n-back working memory task, to test their predictive value in differentiating patients with BD (n=30) from healthy individuals (n=30) and from patients' relatives who were either diagnosed with MDD (n=30) or were free of any personal lifetime history of psychopathology (n=30). Diagnostic stability in these groups was confirmed with 4-year prospective follow-up. Task-based activation patterns from the fMRI data were analyzed with Gaussian Process Classifiers (GPC), a machine learning approach to detecting multivariate patterns in neuroimaging datasets. Consistent significant classification results were only obtained using data from the 3-back versus 0-back contrast. Using contrast, patients with BD were correctly classified compared to unrelated healthy individuals with an accuracy of 83.5%, sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 92.3%. Classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity when comparing patients with BD to their relatives with MDD, were respectively 73.1%, 53.9% and 94.5%. Classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity when comparing patients with BD to their healthy relatives were respectively 81.8%, 72.7% and 90.9%. We show that significant individual classification can be achieved using whole brain pattern analysis of task-based working memory fMRI data. The high accuracy and specificity achieved by all three classifiers suggest that multivariate pattern recognition analyses can aid clinicians in the clinical care of BD in situations of true clinical uncertainty regarding the diagnosis and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.