Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27621952›Full record

ArticleAJP reports2016

Neurological Outcomes after Human Umbilical Cord Patch for In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model.

Ramesha Papanna, Lovepreet K Mann, Saul Snowise, Yisel Morales, Sanjay P Prabhu, Scheffer C G Tseng, Raymond Grill, Stephen Fletcher, Kenneth J Moise

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in AJP reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dural substitutes for spina bifida repair: past, present, and future.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of Human Umbilical Cord and Its Byproducts in Tissue Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ramesha PapannaDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, UTHealth, The University of Texas Health Science at Houston, McGovern Medical School and the Fetal Center at Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Lovepreet K MannDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, UTHealth, The University of Texas Health Science at Houston, McGovern Medical School and the Fetal Center at Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Saul SnowiseDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, UTHealth, The University of Texas Health Science at Houston, McGovern Medical School and the Fetal Center at Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Yisel MoralesDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, UTHealth, The University of Texas Health Science at Houston, McGovern Medical School and the Fetal Center at Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Sanjay P PrabhuDepartment of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Scheffer C G TsengThe Ocular Surface Center, Miami, Florida; TissueTech, Inc., Miami, Florida.
Raymond GrillDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Stephen FletcherDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, The Department of Pediatrics, UTHealth, The University of Texas Health Science at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas; Department of Pediatric Surgery, UTHealth, The University of Texas Health Science at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas.
Kenneth J MoiseDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, UTHealth, The University of Texas Health Science at Houston, McGovern Medical School and the Fetal Center at Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Memorial Hermann · USBoston Children's Hospital · USOcular Surface Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of our study was to test the hypothesis that in utero repair of surgically created spina bifida in a sheep model using cryopreserved human umbilical cord (HUC) patch improves neurological outcome.

methodsSpina bifida with myelotomy was surgically created in timed pregnant ewes at gestational day (GD) 75. The fetuses were randomly assigned to unrepaired versus HUC and treated at GD 95 and then delivered at GD 140. Neurological evaluation was performed using the Texas Spinal Cord Injury Scale (TSCIS), bladder control using ultrasound, and the hindbrain herniation.

resultsThree lambs without the spina bifida creation served as controls. There were four lambs with spina bifida: two were unrepaired and two underwent HUC repair. The control lambs had normal function. Both unrepaired lambs had nonhealed skin lesions with leakage of cerebrospinal fluid, a 0/20 TSCIS score, no bladder control, and the hindbrain herniation. In contrast, both HUC lambs had a completely healed skin defect and survived to day 2 of life, a 3/20 and 4/20 TSCIS score (nociception), partial bladder control, and normal hindbrain anatomy.

conclusionsCryopreserved HUC patch appears to improve survival and neurological outcome in this severe form of the ovine model of spina bifida.

Indexed as

neural tube defectregenerative healingsheep spina bifida modelspina bifida repairumbilical cord

Identifiers

PMID27621952
PMCPMC5017885
OpenAlexW2510061250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.