Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27621771›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2016

Renal sympathetic denervation in therapy resistant hypertension - pathophysiological aspects and predictors for treatment success.

Karl Fengler, Karl Philipp Rommel, Thomas Okon, Gerhard Schuler, Philipp Lurz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karl FenglerKarl Fengler, Karl Philipp Rommel, Thomas Okon, Gerhard Schuler, Philipp Lurz, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig - Heart Center, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Karl Philipp RommelKarl Fengler, Karl Philipp Rommel, Thomas Okon, Gerhard Schuler, Philipp Lurz, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig - Heart Center, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas OkonKarl Fengler, Karl Philipp Rommel, Thomas Okon, Gerhard Schuler, Philipp Lurz, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig - Heart Center, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Gerhard SchulerKarl Fengler, Karl Philipp Rommel, Thomas Okon, Gerhard Schuler, Philipp Lurz, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig - Heart Center, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Philipp LurzKarl Fengler, Karl Philipp Rommel, Thomas Okon, Gerhard Schuler, Philipp Lurz, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig - Heart Center, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many forms of human hypertension are associated with an increased systemic sympathetic activity. Especially the renal sympathetic nervous system has been found to play a prominent role in this context. Therefore, catheter-interventional renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been established as a treatment for patients suffering from therapy resistant hypertension in the past decade. The initial enthusiasm for this treatment was markedly dampened by the results of the Symplicity-HTN-3 trial, although the transferability of the results into clinical practice to date appears to be questionable. In contrast to the extensive use of RDN in treating hypertensive patients within or without clinical trial settings over the past years, its effects on the complex pathophysiological mechanisms underlying therapy resistant hypertension are only partly understood and are part of ongoing research. Effects of RDN have been described on many levels in human trials: From altered systemic sympathetic activity across cardiac and metabolic alterations down to changes in renal function. Most of these changes could sustainably change long-term morbidity and mortality of the treated patients, even if blood pressure remains unchanged. Furthermore, a number of promising predictors for a successful treatment with RDN have been identified recently and further trials are ongoing. This will certainly help to improve the preselection of potential candidates for RDN and thereby optimize treatment outcomes. This review summarizes important pathophysiologic effects of renal denervation and illustrates the currently known predictors for therapy success.

Indexed as

HypertensionPredictorsRenal hypertensionRenal sympathetic denervationSympathetic nervous system

Identifiers

PMID27621771
PMCPMC4997524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.