Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27621708›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2016

Theoretical Considerations and a Mathematical Model for the Analysis of the Biomechanical Response of Human Keratinized Oral Mucosa.

Aikaterini Tsaira, Panagiotis Karagiannidis, Margarita Sidira, Spyros Kassavetis, Dimitris Kugiumtzis, Stergios Logothetidis, Olga Naka, Argirios Pissiotis, Konstantinos Michalakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ultrasonography-Derived Elasticity Estimation of Live Porcine Oral Mucosa.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aikaterini TsairaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Greece.
Panagiotis KaragiannidisLaboratory of Thin Films-Nanosystems and Nanometrology, School of Physics, Aristotle UniversityThessaloniki, Greece; Department of Engineering, Cambridge Graphene Centre, Cambridge UniversityCambridge, UK.
Margarita SidiraDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Greece.
Spyros KassavetisLaboratory of Thin Films-Nanosystems and Nanometrology, School of Physics, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Greece.
Dimitris KugiumtzisDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Greece.
Stergios LogothetidisLaboratory of Thin Films-Nanosystems and Nanometrology, School of Physics, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Greece.
Olga NakaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Greece.
Argirios PissiotisDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Greece.
Konstantinos MichalakisDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Aristotle UniversityThessaloniki, Greece; Division of Graduate and Postgraduate Prosthodontics, Tufts University School of Dental MedicineBoston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Removable complete and partial dentures are supported by the residual alveolar ridges consisting of mucosa, submucosa, periosteum, and bone. An understanding of the biomechanical behavior of the oral mucosa is essential in order to improve the denture-bearing foundations for complete and partially edentulous patients. The purpose of this paper was to examine the biomechanical behavior of the soft tissues supporting a removable denture and develop a model for that reason. Keratinized oral mucosa blocks with their underlying bone were harvested from the maxillary palatal area adjacent to the edentulous ridges of a cadaver. The compressive response of the oral mucosa was tested by using atomic force microscopy. The specimens were first scanned in order their topography to be obtained. The mechanical properties of the specimens were tested using a single crystal silicon pyramidal tip, which traversed toward the keratinized oral mucosa specimens. Loading-unloading cycles were registered and four mathematical models were tested using MATLAB to note which one approximates the force-displacement curve as close as possible: a. spherical, b. conical, c. third order polynomial, d. Murphy (fourth order polynomial, non-linear Hertzian based). The third order polynomial model showed the best accuracy in representing the force-displacement data of the tested specimens. A model was developed in order to analyze the biomechanical behavior of the human oral keratinized mucosa and obtain information about its mechanical properties.

Indexed as

atomic force microscopycontact mechanicscurve fittinghuman oral keratinized mucosamathematical modeloral tissue mechanicspolynomial model

Identifiers

PMID27621708
PMCPMC5002422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.