ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2016
Psychometric properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in home-dwelling older adults.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of measurement properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in geriatric rehabilitation.European geriatric medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Fatigue self-management led by occupational therapists and/or physiotherapists for chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Chronic illness · 2022Pooled it
- Leisure and Productivity in Older Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review.Occupational therapy international · 2021Pooled it
- Creating harmony at home via environmental cueing: A feasibility trial of a non-pharmacological intervention for rural caregivers of persons with dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
- Digital cognitive training for functionality in mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled clinical trial.GeroScience · 2025Trial
- Interprofessional homebased reablement intervention for older adults in Sweden: a randomized controlled trial.BMC geriatrics · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of a Meta-Cognitive Group Intervention for Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline or Mild Cognitive Impairment: The ASPIRE Randomized Controlled Trial.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024Trial
- Feasibility of Telehealth Occupational Therapy for Behavioral Symptoms of Adults With Dementia: Randomized Controlled Trial.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2023Trial
- Effectiveness of Later-Stage Exercise Programs vs Usual Medical Care on Physical Function and Activity After Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2019Trial
- Discordance Between Self-Report and Performance-Based Measures Among At-Risk Older Adults: A Secondary Data Analysis.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2026Article
- Positive changes after a reablement program for older people in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods feasibility study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Interrater Reliability of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Within Geriatric Rehabilitation.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026Article
- Article
- Association between perceived occupational performance and satisfaction and balance, gait, and fear of falling in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Feasibility of At-Home Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Training in Virtual Reality: Case Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Psychometric properties of the Canadian occupational performance measure in older individuals.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is an occupational therapy instrument designed to help participants identify, prioritize, and evaluate performance of important occupations.
objectiveTo investigate the validity, responsiveness, interpretability, and feasibility of the COPM when used by various health professions in home-dwelling older adults receiving reablement. Reablement is a new form of multidisciplinary home-based rehabilitation for older adults experiencing functional decline. PARTICIPANTS AND
methodsThe sample of 225 participants, mean age 80.8 years, who were in need of rehabilitation for various health conditions were included in the study. Data collection was conducted at baseline and at 10 weeks follow-up. The COSMIN guidelines and recommendations for evaluating methodological quality were followed.
resultsContent validity, construct validity, and feasibility were found to be adequate. Responsiveness, however, was moderate. Functional mobility was the most frequently prioritized occupational category of all. Regarding interpretability, the minimal important change was 3.0 points and 3.2 points for performance and satisfaction, respectively. The older adults reported that COPM was a useful and manageable instrument. The majority of the occupational therapists, physiotherapists, and nurses reported that they had the required expertise to conduct the COPM assessments.
conclusionThe results support the multidisciplinary use of the COPM in clinical practice and research in a home-dwelling, heterogeneous population of older adults. Based on the findings, 3 points are recommended as a cutoff point to distinguish between older adults who have a minimal important change in COPM performance and COPM satisfaction and those who have not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.