ReviewVascular health and risk management2016
Critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral-popliteal arterial disease.
Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Pre CE-Marking Study Using the Rontis Drug Coated Balloon for Treatment of Lesions in Femoropopliteal Arteries
The THOR IDE Study
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Urethral Stricture Disease: Three-Year Results from the ROBUST I Study.Research and reports in urology · 2022Trial
- One-year results of drug-coated balloons for long and occlusive Femoropopliteal artery disease: a single-arm trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Trial
- Outcomes of drug-coated balloon urethral dilation in patients with stricture recurrence after urethroplasty.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Drug-Coated Balloon (Optilume®) for the Management of Bulbar Urethral Stricture, Our Experience.Urology research & practice · 2025Article
- Off-label Use of the Optilume Drug-coated Balloon in the Treatment of Bladder Neck Stenosis and Vesicourethral Anastomosis Stenosis.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Durable benefit after treatment of obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia with a novel drug-device combination product: 2-year outcomes from the EVEREST-I study.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- A drug-coated balloon treatment for urethral stricture disease: Two-year results from the ROBUST I study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021Article
- A drug-coated balloon treatment for urethral stricture disease: Interim results from the ROBUST I study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treating Ischemic Limb Diseases.International journal of stem cells · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral arterial disease, particularly critical limb ischemia, is an area with urgent need for optimized therapies because, to date, vascular interventions often have limited life spans. In spite of initial encouraging technical success after femoropopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stenting, postprocedural restenosis remains the major problem. The challenging idea behind the drug-coated balloon (DCB) concept is the biological modification of the injury response after balloon dilatation. Antiproliferative drugs administered via DCBs or drug-eluting stents are able to suppress neointimal hyperplasia, the main cause of restenosis. This article reviews the results of DCB treatments of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal lesions in comparison to standard angioplasty with uncoated balloons. A systematic literature search was performed in 1) medical journals (ie, MEDLINE), 2) international registers for clinical studies (ie, www.clinicaltrials.gov), and 3) abstracts of scientific sessions. Several controlled randomized trials with follow-up periods of up to 5 years demonstrated the efficacy of paclitaxel -DCB technology. However, calcified lesions seem to affect the efficacy of DCB. Combinations of preconditioning methods with DCBs showed promising results. Although the mechanical abrasion of calcium via atherectomy or laser ablation showed favorable periprocedural results, the long-term impact on restenosis and clinical outcome has to be demonstrated. Major advantages of the DCBs are the rapid delivery of drug at uniform concentrations with a single dose, their efficacy in areas wherein stents have been contraindicated until now (ie, bifurcation, ostial lesions), and in leaving no stent scaffold behind. Reinterventions are easier to perform because DCBs leave no metal behind. Various combinations of DCBs with other treatment modalities may prove to be viable options in future. The follow-up results of clinical studies will evaluate the long-term impact of DCBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.