Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27621646›Full record

ReviewVascular health and risk management2016

Critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral-popliteal arterial disease.

Monika Herten, Giovanni B Torsello, Eva Schönefeld, Stefan Stahlhoff

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04821388 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Pre CE-Marking Study Using the Rontis Drug Coated Balloon for Treatment of Lesions in Femoropopliteal Arteries

TypeinterventionalSponsorRontis Hellas SARan2019 to 2021Enrolled30ConditionsPeripheral Artery Disease (PAD)ArmsRontis DCB
NCT05916950 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The THOR IDE Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilips Clinical & Medical Affairs GlobalRan2024 to 2027Enrolled155ConditionsPeripheral Artery Disease, Peripheral Artery Stenosis, Peripheral Artery Calcification, PADArmsThor laser atherectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A drug-coated balloon treatment for urethral stricture disease: Two-year results from the ROBUST I study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  8. A drug-coated balloon treatment for urethral stricture disease: Interim results from the ROBUST I study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Jornal vascular brasileiro
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monika HertenDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Münster.
Giovanni B TorselloDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Münster; Department of Vascular Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital, Münster.
Eva SchönefeldInstitute for Education and Student Affairs, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Stefan StahlhoffDepartment of Vascular Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital, Münster.
University Hospital Münster · DESt. Franziskus Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease, particularly critical limb ischemia, is an area with urgent need for optimized therapies because, to date, vascular interventions often have limited life spans. In spite of initial encouraging technical success after femoropopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stenting, postprocedural restenosis remains the major problem. The challenging idea behind the drug-coated balloon (DCB) concept is the biological modification of the injury response after balloon dilatation. Antiproliferative drugs administered via DCBs or drug-eluting stents are able to suppress neointimal hyperplasia, the main cause of restenosis. This article reviews the results of DCB treatments of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal lesions in comparison to standard angioplasty with uncoated balloons. A systematic literature search was performed in 1) medical journals (ie, MEDLINE), 2) international registers for clinical studies (ie, www.clinicaltrials.gov), and 3) abstracts of scientific sessions. Several controlled randomized trials with follow-up periods of up to 5 years demonstrated the efficacy of paclitaxel -DCB technology. However, calcified lesions seem to affect the efficacy of DCB. Combinations of preconditioning methods with DCBs showed promising results. Although the mechanical abrasion of calcium via atherectomy or laser ablation showed favorable periprocedural results, the long-term impact on restenosis and clinical outcome has to be demonstrated. Major advantages of the DCBs are the rapid delivery of drug at uniform concentrations with a single dose, their efficacy in areas wherein stents have been contraindicated until now (ie, bifurcation, ostial lesions), and in leaving no stent scaffold behind. Reinterventions are easier to perform because DCBs leave no metal behind. Various combinations of DCBs with other treatment modalities may prove to be viable options in future. The follow-up results of clinical studies will evaluate the long-term impact of DCBs.

Indexed as

Coated Materials, BiocompatibleFemoral ArteryPopliteal ArteryVascular Access DevicesAngioplasty, BalloonCardiovascular AgentsConstriction, PathologicCritical IllnessEquipment DesignHumansIschemiaPaclitaxelPeripheral Arterial DiseaseTreatment OutcomeVascular PatencyCardiovascular AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePaclitaxelatherectomycritical limb ischemiadrug-coated balloonperipheral artery diseaserestenosisstent restenosis

Identifiers

PMID27621646
PMCPMC5010165
OpenAlexW2512252084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.