ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016
Capturing patient experience: a qualitative study of implementing real-time feedback in primary care.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of normalisation process theory in understanding implementation processes in primary care settings in the UK: a systematic review.BMC family practice · 2020Pooled it
- Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- Implementing Systematic Assessment of Physical Function in Hospitalised Medical Patients: Description and Evaluation Guided By the Quality Implementation Framework.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Exploring effective patient feedback methods for eHealth in general practice.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Three-year trends and seasonal variation in patient satisfaction with primary health care services in Saudi Arabia: results from the national patient experience measurement program (2022-2024).Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Analyzing Patient Experience on Weibo: Machine Learning Approach to Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- How does staff and patient feedback on hospital quality relate to mortality outcomes? A provider-level national study.Health services management research · 2024Article
- Applying Structural Equation Modelling to Understand the Implementation of Social Distancing in the Professional Lives of Healthcare Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to develop an intervention to improve referral and uptake rates for self-management education for patients with type 2 diabetes in UK primary care.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Article
- Effect of Real-Time Feedback Devices on Primary Care Patient Experience Scores: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.Journal of patient experience · 2021Article
- How to implement patient experience surveys and use their findings for service improvement: a qualitative expert consultation study in Australian general practice.Integrated healthcare journal · 2020Article
- Article
- Using CollaboRATE, a brief patient-reported measure of shared decision making: Results from three clinical settings in the United States.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Article
- The Friends and Family Test in general practice in England: a qualitative study of the views of staff and patients.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017Article
- Implementing online patient feedback in a 'special measures' acute hospital: A case study using Normalisation Process Theory.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, hospitals have made use of new technologies, such as real-time feedback, to collect patient experience information. This approach is currently rarely used in primary care settings, but may provide practices with a useful tool that enables them to take prompt, focused action to improve their services.
aimTo identify the factors inhibiting and enabling the implementation of real-time feedback in general practices. DESIGN AND
settingQualitative study embedded within an exploratory trial (July 2014 to February 2015) of a real-time feedback intervention targeting patient experience in general practices in south-west England and Cambridgeshire.
methodSemi-structured interviews (n = 22) and focus groups (n = 4, total of 28 attendees) with practice staff were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically, using a framework based on constructs from normalisation process theory.
resultsStaff engagement with real-time feedback varied considerably, and staff made sense of real-time feedback by comparing it with more familiar feedback modalities. Effective within-team communication was associated with positive attitudes towards real-time feedback. Timing of requests for feedback was important in relation to patient engagement. Real-time feedback may offer potential as a means of informing practice development, perhaps as a component of a wider programme of capturing and responding to patients' comments.
conclusionSuccessful implementation of real-time feedback requires effective communication across the practice team to engender thorough engagement. Feedback processes should be carefully introduced to fit with existing patient and practice routines. Future studies should consider making real-time feedback content relevant to specific practice needs, and support participation by all patient groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.