Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27620878›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2016

Revised CT angiography venous score with consideration of infratentorial circulation value for diagnosing brain death.

Antoine J Marchand, Philippe Seguin, Yannick Malledant, Marion Taleb, Hélène Raoult, Jean Yves Gauvrit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Antoine J MarchandDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University and Regional Hospital Center (CHRU) of Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France. antoine.marchand@chu-rennes.fr.
Philippe SeguinService d'Anesthésie Réanimation 1, CHU Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France.
Yannick MalledantService d'Anesthésie Réanimation 1, CHU Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France.
Marion TalebService d'Anesthésie Réanimation 1, CHU Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France.
Hélène RaoultDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University and Regional Hospital Center (CHRU) of Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France.
Jean Yves GauvritDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University and Regional Hospital Center (CHRU) of Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputed tomography angiography (CTA) is largely performed in European countries as an ancillary test for diagnosing brain death. However, CTA suffers from a lack of sensitivity, especially in patients who have previously undergone decompressive craniectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a revised four-point venous CTA score, including non-opacification of the infratentorial venous circulation, for diagnosing brain death.

methodsA preliminary study of 43 control patients with normal CTAs confirmed that the infratentorial superior petrosal vein (SPV) was consistently visible. Therefore, 76 patients (including ten with decompressive craniectomy) who were investigated with 83 CTAs to confirm clinical brain death were consecutively enrolled between July 2011 and July 2013 at a university centre. The image analysis consisted of recording non-opacification of the cortical segment of the middle cerebral artery and internal cerebral vein (ICV), which were used as the reference CTA score, as well as non-opacification of the SPV. The diagnostic performance of the revised four-point venous CTA score based on the non-opacification of both the ICV and SPV was assessed and compared with that of the reference CTA score.

resultsThe revised four-point venous CTA score showed a sensitivity of 95 % for confirming clinical brain death versus a sensitivity of 88 % with the reference CTA score. Non-opacification of the SPV was observed in 95 % of the patients. In the decompressive craniectomy group, the revised four-point CTA score showed a sensitivity of 100 % compared with a sensitivity of 80 % using the reference CTA score.

conclusionCompared with the reference CTA score, the revised four-point venous CTA score based on ICV and SPV non-opacification showed superior diagnostic performance for confirming brain death, including for patients with decompressive craniectomy.

Indexed as

Brain death diagnosisComputed tomography angiographyConfirmatory testRevised four-point venous score

Identifiers

PMID27620878
PMCPMC5020015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.