ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2017
Current status in cancer cell reprogramming and its clinical implications.
Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Lethal effects of mitochondria via microfluidics.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Article
- Regulation of Cell Plasticity by Bromodomain and Extraterminal Domain (BET) Proteins: A New Perspective in Glioblastoma Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Hypoxia-induced cancer cell reprogramming: a review on how cancer stem cells arise.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Developing Bottom-Up Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Solid Tumor Models Using Precision Genome Editing Technologies.The CRISPR journal · 2022Review
- Functional and embedding feature analysis for pan-cancer classification.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Chrysophanol exhibits anti-cancer activities in lung cancer cell through regulating ROS/HIF-1a/VEGF signaling pathway.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2020Article
- Reprogramming of Cancer Cells into Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Questioned.International journal of stem cells · 2019Article
- Identification of protein kinase inhibitors to reprogram breast cancer cells.Cell death & disease · 2018Article
- Reprogramming glioblastoma multiforme cells into neurons by protein kinase inhibitors.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2018Article
- Epigenetic Contribution of High-Mobility Group A Proteins to Stem Cell Properties.International journal of cell biology · 2018Review
- High-content image informatics of the structural nuclear protein NuMA parses trajectories for stem/progenitor cell lineages and oncogenic transformation.Experimental cell research · 2017Article
- Cancer cell reprogramming to identify the genes competent for generating liver cancer stem cells.Inflammation and regeneration · 2017Review
- Reprogramming-driven Proteomic Shifts Mirror Bladder Cancer Progression and Reveal Biomarker Candidates Across Disease Grades.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe technology of reprogramming a terminally differentiated cell to an embryonic-like state uncovered the possibility of reprogramming a malignant cell back to a more manageable stem cell-like state. Since the current cancer models suffer from reflecting heterogeneous tumour structure and limited to express the late-stage markers, the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology could provide an alternative model to recapitulate the early stages of cancer. Generation of iPSCs from cancer cells could offer a tool for understanding the mechanisms of tumour initiation-progression in vitro, a platform for studying tumour heterogeneity and origin of cancer stem cells and a source for cancer type-specific drug discovery studies.
methodsIn this review, we discussed the recent findings in reprogramming cancer cells with a special emphasis on similarities between cancer cells and pluripotent cells. We presented the basis of challenges in cancer cell reprogramming including the current problems in reprogramming, cancer-specific epigenetic state and chromosomal aberrations.
resultsCancer epigenetics represent the major hurdle before the prospective use of cancer iPSCs as a model system and for biomarker research. When the reprogramming process is optimised for cancer cell types, it might serve for two purposes: identification of the specific epigenetic state of cancer as well as reversion of the malignant phenotype to a potentially malignant but manageable state.
conclusionsReprogramming cancer cells would serve for our understanding of cancer-specific epigenome and elucidation of overlapping mechanisms shared by cancer-initiating cells and pluripotent cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.