Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27620550›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2017

Lipopolysaccharide Alters Motivated Behavior in a Monetary Reward Task: a Randomized Trial.

Julie Lasselin, Michael T Treadway, Tamara E Lacourt, Anne Soop, Mats J Olsson, Bianka Karshikoff, Sofie Paues-Göranson, John Axelsson, Robert Dantzer, Mats Lekander

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Biological motion during inflammation in humans.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2020
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julie LasselinDivision for Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8323-0714
Michael T TreadwayDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tamara E LacourtDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Anne SoopDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mats J OlssonDivision for Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bianka KarshikoffDivision for Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sofie Paues-GöransonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
John AxelssonDivision for Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Robert DantzerDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mats LekanderDivision for Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Dynamics of Inflammation and its Blockade on Motivational Circuitry in DepressionR01MH108605 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI TREADWAY, MICHAEL TILGHMAN · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Stress and MDD effects on mPFC Glutamate and GABA during reward processingR00MH102355 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI TREADWAY, MICHAEL TILGHMAN · 2015 to 2017
$733k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH102355NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammation-induced sickness is associated with a large set of behavioral alterations; however, its motivational aspects remain poorly explored in humans. The present study assessed the effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration at a dose of 2 ng/kg of body weight on motivation in 21 healthy human subjects in a double-blinded, placebo (saline)-controlled, cross-over design. Incentive motivation and reward sensitivity were measured using the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT), in which motivation for high-effort/high-reward trials vs low-effort/low-reward trials are manipulated by variations in reward magnitude and probability to win. Because of the strong interactions between sleepiness and motivation, the role of sleepiness was also determined. As expected, the probability to win predicted the choice to engage in high-effort/high-reward trials; however, this occurred at a greater extent after LPS than after saline administration. This effect was related to the level of sleepiness. Sleepiness increased motivation to choose the high-effort/high-reward mode of response, but only when the probability to win was the highest. LPS had no effect on reward sensitivity either directly or via sleepiness. These results indicate that systemic inflammation induced by LPS administration causes motivational changes in young healthy subjects, which are associated with sleepiness. Thus, despite its association with energy-saving behaviors, sickness allows increased incentive motivation when the effort is deemed worthwhile.

Indexed as

RewardAdultChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansIllness BehaviorInflammationLipopolysaccharidesMaleMotivationPsychomotor PerformanceWakefulnessYoung AdultLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID27620550
PMCPMC5312062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.