Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27620345›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2016

A preliminary study of longitudinal neuroadaptation associated with recovery from addiction.

Sarah E Forster, Peter R Finn, Joshua W Brown

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah E ForsterIndiana University, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, United States; VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, United States; University of Pittsburgh, Department of Psychiatry, United States.
Peter R FinnIndiana University, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, United States.
Joshua W BrownIndiana University, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, United States. Electronic address: jwmbrown@indiana.edu.
Indiana University · US

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Behavioral Disinhibition in Early-onset AlcoholismR01AA013650 · NIAAA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI FINN, PETER R · 2002 to 2018
$5.5M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute-T32 Program TL1TL1RR025759 · NCRR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2008 to 2011
$710k
Neural mechanisms of risky behavior avoidanceR01DA026457 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, JOSHUA W · 2009 to 2010
$684k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR025759NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013650NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have explored longitudinal change in event-related brain responses during early recovery from addiction. Moreover, existing findings yield evidence of both increased and decreased signaling within reward and control centers over time. The current study explored reward- and control-related signals in a risky decision-making task and specifically investigated parametric modulations of the BOLD signal, rather than signal magnitude alone. It was hypothesized that risk-related signals during decision-making and outcome evaluation would reflect recovery and that change in specific signals would correspond with improved treatment outcomes.

methodsTwenty-one substance dependent individuals were recruited upon enrollment in community-based substance use treatment programs, wherein they received treatment-as-usual. Participants completed functional neuroimaging assessments at baseline and 3-month follow-up while performing the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Risk- and reward-sensitive signals were identified using parametric modulators. Substance use was tracked throughout the 3-month study interval using the timeline follow-back procedure.

resultsLongitudinal contrasts of parametric modulators suggested improved formation of risk-informed outcome expectations at follow-up. Specifically, a greater response to high risk (low-likelihood) positive feedback was identified in caudal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and a greater response to low risk (low-likelihood) negative feedback was identified in caudal ACC and inferior frontal gyrus. In addition, attenuation of a ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) "reward-seeking" signal (i.e., increasing response with greater reward) during risky decisions at follow-up was associated with less substance use during the study interval.

conclusionsChanges in risk- and reward-related signaling in ACC/vmPFC appear to reflect recovery and may support sobriety.

Indexed as

RewardAdultBehavior, AddictiveBrain MappingDecision MakingFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsPrefrontal CortexRiskRisk-TakingSubstance-Related DisordersAnterior cingulate cortexBalloon analogue risk taskDecision-makingfMRIMonetary rewardTreatment outcomeVentromedial prefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID27620345
PMCPMC5086261
OpenAlexW2510182023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.