Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27620174›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2017

Enabling Anyone to Translate Clinically Relevant Ideas to Therapies.

Sean Ekins, Natalie Diaz, Julia Chung, Paul Mathews, Aaron McMurtray

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sean EkinsCollaborations Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 5616 Hilltop Needmore Road, Fuquay-Varina, Noth Carolina, 27526, USA. collaborationspharma@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5691-5790
Natalie DiazDepartment of Neurology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California, 90502, USA.
Julia ChungDepartment of Psychiatry, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California, 90502, USA.
Paul MathewsDepartment of Neurology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California, 90502, USA.
Aaron McMurtrayDepartment of Neurology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California, 90502, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do we inspire new ideas that could lead to potential treatments for rare or neglected diseases, and allow for serendipity that could help to catalyze them? How many potentially good ideas are lost because they are never tested? What if those ideas could have lead to new therapeutic approaches and major healthcare advances? If a clinician or anyone for that matter, has a new idea they want to test to develop a molecule or therapeutic that they could translate to the clinic, how would they do it without a laboratory or funding? These are not idle theoretical questions but addressing them could have potentially huge economic implications for nations. If we fail to capture the diversity of ideas and test them we may also lose out on the next blockbuster treatments. Many of those involved in the process of ideation may be discouraged and simply not know where to go. We try to address these questions and describe how there are options to raising funding, how even small scale investments can foster preclinical or clinical translation, and how there are several approaches to outsourcing the experiments, whether to collaborators or commercial enterprises. While these are not new or far from complete solutions, they are first steps that can be taken by virtually anyone while we work on other solutions to build a more concrete structure for the "idea-hypothesis testing-proof of concept-translation-breakthrough pathway".

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAnimalsCooperative BehaviorDrug IndustryHumansLaboratoriesNeglected DiseasesResearchTherapeuticsdrug discoveryideasproof of conceptserendipity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.