Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27619969›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

A rank based social norms model of how people judge their levels of drunkenness whilst intoxicated.

Simon C Moore, Alex M Wood, Laurence Moore, Jonathan Shepherd, Simon Murphy, Gordon D A Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Combining refutations and social norms increases belief change.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Simon C MooreViolence & Society Research Group, School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XY, UK. mooresc2@cardiff.ac.uk.
Alex M WoodBehavioural Science Centre, Stirling Management School, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, FK9 4LA, UK.
Laurence MooreMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, Scotland, G2 3QB, UK.
Jonathan ShepherdViolence & Society Research Group, School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XY, UK.
Simon MurphyCentre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, Wales, CF10 3BD, UK.
Gordon D A BrownDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, CV4 7AL, UK.
Cardiff University · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Stirling · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of Health 10/3010/21Medical Research Council G0701758Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/11Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/14Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT087640MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA rank based social norms model predicts that drinkers' judgements about their drinking will be based on the rank of their breath alcohol level amongst that of others in the immediate environment, rather than their actual breath alcohol level, with lower relative rank associated with greater feelings of safety. This study tested this hypothesis and examined how people judge their levels of drunkenness and the health consequences of their drinking whilst they are intoxicated in social drinking environments.

methodsBreath alcohol testing of 1,862 people (mean age = 26.96 years; 61.86 % male) in drinking environments. A subset (N = 400) also answered four questions asking about their perceptions of their drunkenness and the health consequences of their drinking (plus background measures).

resultsPerceptions of drunkenness and the health consequences of drinking were regressed on: (a) breath alcohol level, (b) the rank of the breath alcohol level amongst that of others in the same environment, and (c) covariates. Only rank of breath alcohol level predicted perceptions: How drunk they felt (b 3.78, 95 % CI 1.69 5.87), how extreme they regarded their drinking that night (b 3.7, 95 % CI 1.3 6.20), how at risk their long-term health was due to their current level of drinking (b 4.1, 95 % CI 0.2 8.0) and how likely they felt they would experience liver cirrhosis (b 4.8. 95 % CI 0.7 8.8). People were more influenced by more sober others than by more drunk others.

conclusionWhilst intoxicated and in drinking environments, people base judgements regarding their drinking on how their level of intoxication ranks relative to that of others of the same gender around them, not on their actual levels of intoxication. Thus, when in the company of others who are intoxicated, drinkers were found to be more likely to underestimate their own level of drinking, drunkenness and associated risks. The implications of these results, for example that increasing the numbers of sober people in night time environments could improve subjective assessments of drunkenness, are discussed.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationSocial BehaviorSocial NormsAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic IntoxicationBreath TestsFemaleHumansMalePerceptionRegression AnalysisYoung AdultAlcoholDecision by samplingRelative rank hypothesisRiskSocial norms

Identifiers

PMID27619969
PMCPMC5020440
OpenAlexW2515123010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.