Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27619826›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

How did a Housing First intervention improve health and social outcomes among homeless adults with mental illness in Toronto? Two-year outcomes from a randomised trial.

Patricia O'Campo, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Pam Nir, Matthew Levy, Vachan Misir, Antony Chum, Bouchra Arbach, Rosane Nisenbaum, Matthew J To, Stephen W Hwang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Individual-Level Predictors for Becoming Homeless and Exiting Homelessness: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Patricia O'CampoCentre for Research on Inner City Health, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vicky StergiopoulosCentre for Research on Inner City Health, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pam NirCota, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew LevyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vachan MisirCentre for Research on Inner City Health, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Antony ChumSocial and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Bouchra ArbachCota, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rosane NisenbaumCentre for Research on Inner City Health, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew J ToCentre for Research on Inner City Health, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stephen W HwangCentre for Research on Inner City Health, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CAPublic Health Ontario · CAUniversity of Toronto · CALondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe studied the impact of a Housing First (HF) intervention on housing, contact with the justice system, healthcare usage and health outcomes among At Home/Chez Soi randomised trial participants in Toronto, a city with an extensive service network for social and health services for individuals who are experiencing homelessness and mental illness.

methodsParticipants identified as high needs were randomised to receive either the intervention which provided them with housing and supports by an assertive community treatment team (HF+ACT) or treatment as usual (TAU). Participants (N=197) had in-person interviews every 3 months for 2 years.

resultsThe HF+ACT group spent more time stably housed compared to the TAU group with the mean difference between the groups of 45.8% (95% CI 37.1% to 54.4%, p<0.0001). Accounting for baseline differences, HF+ACT group showed significant improvements over TAU group for community functioning, selected quality-of-life subscales and arrests at some time points during follow-up. No differences between HF+ACT and TAU groups over the follow-up were observed for health service usage, community integration and substance use.

conclusionsHF for individuals with high levels of need increased housing stability and selected health and justice outcomes over 2 years in a city with many social and health services. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN42520374.

Indexed as

Health StatusAdultCanadaCommunity Mental Health ServicesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHousingHumansIll-Housed PersonsInterviews as TopicMaleMental DisordersProgram EvaluationSocial WorkUrban PopulationHealth services utilizationHomelessnessHousing FirstHousing StabilityMental Illness

Identifiers

PMID27619826
PMCPMC5030577
OpenAlexW2519148602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.