SynthesisJournal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research2017
Team science as interprofessional collaborative research practice: a systematic review of the science of team science literature.
Synthesis in Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Interprofessional collaboration in internal medicine : Developments between health professions in German language publications].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Interpretive ethnographic studies and in-depth qualitative research should be treated as high-quality evidence in the science of team science.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Translational medicine: An effective approach to improve healthcare by research and innovation in developing countries.Medicine · 2025Review
- How Team Science Is Documented and Described in Published Family Medicine Research.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
- Team science in interdisciplinary health professions education research: a multi-institutional case study.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2025Article
- Implementing TeamMAPPS: Formative qualitative findings from the dissemination and implementation study of a new evidence-based team science intervention.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Applying Implementation Science to Advance Electronic Health Record-Driven Learning Health Systems: Case Studies, Challenges, and Recommendations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- The intersection of community engagement and team science research: A scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Learning to Prioritize Our Collaborative Opportunities: Overcoming the Bright Shiny Object Syndrome.The Journal of continuing education in the health professions · 2023Article
- Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Moving Morehouse School of Medicine Translation TInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- The pursuit of health equity in digital transformation, health informatics, and the cardiovascular learning healthcare system.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Clinician-Scientist Faculty Mentoring Program (FAME) - A New Inclusive Training Model at Penn State Increases Scholarly Productivity and Extramural Grant Funding.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- An integrative review and practical guide to team development interventions for translational science teams: One size does not fit all.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Review
- Plant science decadal vision 2020-2030: Reimagining the potential of plants for a healthy and sustainable future.Plant direct · 2020Article
- Promoting interdisciplinary research to respond to public health crises: The response of the Columbia University CTSA to the opioid crisis.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Researcher Perspectives on Data Sharing in Deep Brain Stimulation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Identifying strategies to promote team science in dissemination and implementation research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2019Article
- Managing different intellectual personalities in scientific teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2019Article
- The AGING Initiative experience: a call for sustained support for team science networks.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Institute of Health's concept of team science is a means of addressing complex clinical problems by applying conceptual and methodological approaches from multiple disciplines and health professions. The ultimate goal is the improved quality of care of patients with an emphasis on better population health outcomes. Collaborative research practice occurs when researchers from >1 health-related profession engage in scientific inquiry to jointly create and disseminate new knowledge to clinical and research health professionals in order to provide the highest quality of patient care to improve population health outcomes. Training of clinicians and researchers is necessary to produce clinically relevant evidence upon which to base patient care for disease management and empirically guided team-based patient care. In this study, we hypothesized that team science is an example of effective and impactful interprofessional collaborative research practice. To assess this hypothesis, we examined the contemporary literature on the science of team science (SciTS) produced in the past 10 years (2005-2015) and related the SciTS to the overall field of interprofessional collaborative practice, of which collaborative research practice is a subset. A modified preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) approach was employed to analyze the SciTS literature in light of the general question: Is team science an example of interprofessional collaborative research practice? After completing a systematic review of the SciTS literature, the posed hypothesis was accepted, concluding that team science is a dimension of interprofessional collaborative practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.