Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27619173›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2016

Mouse preferential incising force orientation changes during jaw closing muscle hyperalgesia and is sex dependent.

C G Widmer, J Morris-Wiman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C G WidmerDept. of Orthodontics, Box 100444, JHMHSC, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0444, USA. Electronic address: widmer@dental.ufl.edu.
J Morris-WimanBiomedical Sciences, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, 400 North Lee St., Lewisburg, VA 24901, USA. Electronic address: jmorriswiman@osteo.wvsom.edu.
University of Florida · USWest Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine · US

Funding

Behavioral Assays for Orofacial PainR21DE021849 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI WIDMER, CHARLES G. · 2011 to 2012
$380k
NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE021849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMouse incising is controlled by a central pattern generator and this activity can change in the presence of pain. The incising frequency and maximum force generation decreases with pain. In this study, we used repetitive acidic injections in the left masseter muscle of male and female mice to determine differences between baseline and jaw muscle pain conditions and the effect of sex on preferential incising direction.

methodsA within subject design was used to evaluate data previously acquired using multi-axis force data (X, Y and Z) from the 4th baseline recording day and day 7 post-injection (day of maximal pain response) for each mouse of each sex. A total of 34 female and male (age 3-9months) CD-1 mice were evaluated. After mathematically rotating the X and Y axes to align the Y axis to be parallel to the wire struts of the cage top, data were analyzed to determine incising direction preference during baseline (non-pain) and pain (day 7) conditions and between sex. Radar plots of X-Y, X-Z and Y-Z axes depicted the average direction of incising preference between baseline and pain conditions for each sex. Statistical differences among groups were tested using a mixed model ANOVA.

resultsSimilar to previous findings, female mice had a more robust difference in incising direction preference when comparing male and female pain conditions and this was most evident in the X-Z axes. The incising frequencies most commonly affected were 5.3, 6.2 and 7.6Hz. Male mice varied little in their incising direction preference between the baseline and pain conditions. In addition, statistical comparison of ratios of the percent of time spent incising in the Z versus X axes for each incising frequency found that the incising preference was not different when comparing 5.3 and 7.6Hz frequencies. Finally, female mice used a novel approach to minimize pain while incising by rotating their head and body nearly 180 degrees while males did not use this strategy as frequently.

conclusionsThe preferred incising direction changes in a jaw muscle pain condition and this information can be used to further characterize functional pain in the masticatory muscle system. The changes were dependent on the incising frequency generated by the central pattern generator for incising.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAcidsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBite ForceDisease Models, AnimalElectromyographyFemaleHyperalgesiaJawMaleMasticationMasticatory MusclesMiceMyalgiaAcidsCentral pattern generatorIncising forcesMasticationPain

Identifiers

PMID27619173
PMCPMC5159302
OpenAlexW2520586567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.