Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27618841›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2016

Prevalence of medication discrepancies in patients with cirrhosis: a pilot study.

Kelly L Hayward, Patricia C Valery, W Neil Cottrell, Katharine M Irvine, Leigh U Horsfall, Caroline J Tallis, Veronique S Chachay, Brittany J Ruffin, Jennifer H Martin, Elizabeth E Powell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Optimizing medication management for patients with cirrhosis: Evidence-based strategies and their outcomes.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly L HaywardSchool of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Patricia C ValeryQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
W Neil CottrellSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Katharine M IrvineCentre for Liver Disease Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Leigh U HorsfallCentre for Liver Disease Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Caroline J TallisDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba 4102, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Veronique S ChachaySchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Brittany J RuffinCentre for Liver Disease Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jennifer H MartinSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Elizabeth E PowellCentre for Liver Disease Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. e.powell@uq.edu.au.
The University of Queensland · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUTranslational Research Institute · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirrhosis patients are prescribed multiple medications for their liver disease and comorbidities. Discrepancies between medicines consumed by patients and those documented in the medical record may contribute to patient harm and impair disease management. The aim of the present study was to assess the magnitude and types of discrepancies among patient-reported and medical record-documented medications in patients with cirrhosis, and examine factors associated with such discrepancies.

methodsFifty patients who attended a hospital hepatology outpatient clinic were interviewed using a questionnaire composed of mixed short-response and multiple-choice questions. Patients' reported medication use was compared with documentation in the hospital medical records and pharmacy database. Medication adherence was assessed using the 8-question ©Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). The multivariate logistic regression model was constructed using clinically relevant and/or statistically significant variables as determined by univariate analysis. All p-values were 2-sided (α = 0.05).

resultsTwenty-seven patients (54.0 %) had ≥1 discrepancy between reported and documented medicines. Patients with ≥1 discrepancy were older (p = 0.04) and multivariate analysis identified taking ≥5 conventional medicines or having a 'low' or 'medium' adherence ranking as independent predictors of discrepancy (adjusted OR 11.0 (95 % CI 1.8-67.4), 20.7 (95 % CI 1.3-337.7) and 49.0 (95 % CI 3.3-718.5) respectively). Concordance was highest for liver disease medicines (71.9 %) and lowest for complementary and alternative medicines (14.5 %) and respiratory medicines (0 %).

conclusionThere is significant discrepancy between sources of patient medication information within the hepatology clinic. Medication reconciliation and medicines-management intervention may address the complex relationship between medication discrepancies, number of medications and patient adherence identified in this study.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisLogistic ModelsMaleMedication ReconciliationMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPilot ProjectsPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesAmbulatory careComplementary therapiesLiver cirrhosisMedication adherenceMedication reconciliation

Identifiers

PMID27618841
PMCPMC5020443
OpenAlexW2519287520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.