Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27618824›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2017

The Dynamics of a Genetic Counseling Peer Supervision Group.

Katie L Lewis, Lori A H Erby, Amanda L Bergner, E Kate Reed, Maria R Johnson, Jessica Y Adcock, Meredith A Weaver

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katie L LewisMedical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, Room 3C710C, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1253, USA. lewiskatie@mail.nih.gov.
Lori A H ErbySocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Amanda L BergnerJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
E Kate ReedJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Maria R JohnsonJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jessica Y AdcockGreater Baltimore Medical Center, Towson, MD, USA.
Meredith A WeaverAmerican College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supervision is a practice that is utilized by a variety of practitioners to hone their counseling skills. Genetic counselors have embraced the supervision process, and some seek out supervision in a group setting with peers. Researchers have described the structure and content of genetic counseling peer supervision groups, and provided evidence for the benefits of seeking peer supervision. This study aimed to describe the interpersonal aspects of one genetic counseling peer supervision group, including personality traits and group dynamics, and how those factors influenced our experiences within the group. We also describe how the process of evaluating these factors impacted us individually and collectively. There was consensus that the group was a safe and trusting one, which was united by similar goals and mutual respect. Members reported gaining insights about how their own personality functioned within the group milieu, and also how the group setting impacted them. Based on our experiences, we recommend that other peer supervision groups consider similar self-evaluations on a periodic basis, both to enhance group functioning and to allow for increased self-awareness and professional growth.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGroup ProcessesInterpersonal RelationsPeer GroupPersonalityAdultCounselorsFemaleHumansGenetic counselingGroup dynamicsPeer supervisionPersonalityProfessional development

Identifiers

PMID27618824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.