Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27618813›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2016

Aortic stiffening and its impact on left atrial volumes and function in patients after successful coarctation repair: a multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Inga Voges, Julian Kees, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Hannes Gottschalk, Jens Trentmann, Christopher Hart, Dominik D Gabbert, Eileen Pardun, Minh Pham, Ana C Andrade and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Relationship between left atrial myopathy and atrial fibrillation in adults with coarctation of aorta.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023
    Article
  4. Editorial: Aortopathy in congenital heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Preclinical Aortic Atherosclerosis in Adolescents With Chronic Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Review
  15. Impaired aortic distensibility and elevated central blood pressure in Turner Syndrome: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Article
  16. Impact of different coarctation therapies on aortic stiffness: phase-contrast MRI study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) 2015-2016 and transition of the JCMR office to Boston.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Inga VogesDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7406-8006
Julian KeesDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Michael Jerosch-HeroldDepartment of Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Hannes GottschalkDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Jens TrentmannDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Christopher HartDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Dominik D GabbertDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Eileen PardunDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Minh PhamDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Ana C AndradeDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Philip WegnerDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Ines KristoDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Olav JansenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Hans-Heiner KramerDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Carsten RickersDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 9, 24105, Kiel, Germany. rickers@pedcard.uni-kiel.de.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increased cardiovascular morbidity of adults with late repair of aortic coarctation (CoA) has been well documented. In contrast, successful CoA repair in early childhood has a generally good prognosis, though adverse vascular and ventricular characteristics may be abnormal, which could increase long-term risk. This study sought to perform a comprehensive analysis of aortic elasticity and left ventricular (LV) function in patients with aortic coarctation (CoA) using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). In a subgroup of patients, we assessed structure and function of the common carotid arteries to probe for signs of systemic vascular remodeling.

methodsFifty-one patients (median age 17.3 years), 13.9 ± 7.5 years after CoA repair, and 54 controls (median age 19.8 years) underwent CMR. We determined distensibility and pulse wave velocity (PWV) at different aortic locations. In a subgroup, common carotid artery distensibility, PWV, wall thickness and wall area were measured. LV ejection fraction (EF), volumes, and mass were measured from short axis views. Left atrial (LA) volumes and functional parameters (LAEFPassive, LAEFContractile, LAEFReservoir) were assessed from axial cine images.

resultsIn patients distensibility of the whole thoracic aorta was reduced (p < 0.05) while PWV was only significantly higher in the aortic arch (p < 0.01). Distensibility of the descending aorta at the level of the pulmonary arteries and PWV in the descending aorta, both correlated negatively with age at CoA repair. LA volume before atrial contraction and minimal LA volume were higher in patients (p < 0.05). LAEFPassive and LAEFReservoir were reduced (p < 0.05), and LAEFReservoir correlated negatively with aortic arch PWV (p < 0.05). LVEF, volumes and mass were not different from controls. Carotid wall thickness and PWV were higher in patients compared to controls (p < 0.05).

conclusionsPatients after CoA repair have impaired bioelastic properties of the thoracic aorta with impact on LV diastolic function. Reduced descending aortic elasticity is associated with older age at time of CoA repair. The remodeling of the common carotid artery in our sub-study suggests systemic vessel wall changes.

Indexed as

Atrial Function, LeftMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineVascular StiffnessAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAorta, ThoracicAortic CoarctationCardiac Surgical ProceduresCarotid Artery, CommonCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAortic coarctationAortic distensibilityArterial stiffnessLeft ventricular diastolic functionPulse wave velocity

Identifiers

PMID27618813
PMCPMC5020476
OpenAlexW2518923615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.