ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2016
Examining the Language Phenotype in Children With Typical Development, Specific Language Impairment, and Fragile X Syndrome.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Surface Performance: Analyzing Grammatical Production and Judgment Abilities in Boys With Fragile X Syndrome.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
- Comparison of Linguistic Error Production in Conversational Language Among Boys With Fragile X Syndrome + Autism Spectrum Disorder and Autistic Boys.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Adversity Exposure, Syntax, and Specific Language Impairment: An Exploratory Study.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Communication in fragile X syndrome: Patterns and implications for assessment and intervention.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Written Language Production in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Grammatical judgment and production in male participants with idiopathic autism spectrum disorder.Clinical linguistics & phonetics · 2020Article
- Language Development From Early Childhood to Adolescence in Youths With Fragile X Syndrome.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- Comparing Morphosyntactic Profiles of Children With Developmental Language Disorder or Language Disorder Associated With Autism Spectrum Disorder.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2020Article
- Assessment of Language Abilities in Minority Adolescents and Young Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Extensive Special Education Needs: A Pilot Study.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2020Article
- Comparing Tense and Agreement Productivity in Boys With Fragile X Syndrome, Children With Developmental Language Disorder, and Children With Typical Development.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- A Pilot Quantitative Evaluation of Early Life Language Development in Fragile X Syndrome.Brain sciences · 2019Article
- Grammar in Boys With Idiopathic Autism Spectrum Disorder and Boys With Fragile X Syndrome Plus Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2018Article
- Exemplar Variability Facilitates Retention of Word Learning by Children With Specific Language Impairment.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2018Article
- Investigating the Receptive-Expressive Vocabulary Profile in Children with Idiopathic ASD and Comorbid ASD and Fragile X Syndrome.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2017Article
- Rates and Predictors of Co-occurring Autism Spectrum Disorder in Boys with Fragile X Syndrome.Autism & developmental language impairmentsArticle
- Expressive language abilities of boys with idiopathic autism spectrum disorder and boys with fragile X syndrome + autism spectrum disorder: Cross-context comparisons.Autism & developmental language impairmentsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: One aspect of morphosyntax, finiteness marking, was compared in children with fragile X syndrome (FXS), specific language impairment (SLI), and typical development matched on mean length of utterance (MLU). Method: Nineteen children with typical development (mean age = 3.3 years), 20 children with SLI (mean age = 4.9 years), and 17 boys with FXS (mean age = 11.9 years) completed the Test of Early Grammatical Impairment (TEGI; Rice & Wexler, 2001), and other cognitive and language assessments. Quantitative comparisons on finiteness marking and qualitative comparisons of unscorable (i.e., nontarget) TEGI responses were conducted. Results: Children with typical development and FXS performed better on finiteness marking than children with SLI. Although unscorable responses were infrequent, boys with FXS produced more unscorable responses than children with typical development and SLI. Conclusions: Although boys with FXS have language deficits, they performed similarly to MLU-matched typically developing children on finiteness marking. This language profile differs from children with SLI, who present with a delay-within-a-delay profile with finiteness marking delays that exceed delays in MLU. Unscorable responses produced by the boys with FXS may reflect pragmatic deficits, which are prominent in this population. Assessment procedures should be carefully considered when examining language in boys with FXS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.