ArticlePloS one2016
Rapid Bacterial Detection via an All-Electronic CMOS Biosensor.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Monolithic, Thiol-Functionalized Au-Based Bio-CMOS Aptasensor for Rapid, Label-Free Detection ofBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Microfluidic-Based Whole-Cell Biosensor Systems-Challenges and Future Applications.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Mitigating Global Challenges: Harnessing Green Synthesized Nanomaterials for Sustainable Crop Production Systems.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2024Review
- Review of Label-Free Monitoring of Bacteria: From Challenging Practical Applications to Basic Research Perspectives.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Article
- Biosensing based on field-effect transistors (FET): Recent progress and challenges.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2020Review
- Applications of CMOS Devices for the Diagnosis and Control of Infectious Diseases.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Printed Circuit Board (PCB) Technology for Electrochemical Sensors and Sensing Platforms.Biosensors · 2020Review
- Dielectrophoresis assisted rapid, selective and single cell detection of antibiotic resistant bacteria with G-FETs.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2020Article
- Microbiological Sensing Technologies: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The timely and accurate diagnosis of infectious diseases is one of the greatest challenges currently facing modern medicine. The development of innovative techniques for the rapid and accurate identification of bacterial pathogens in point-of-care facilities using low-cost, portable instruments is essential. We have developed a novel all-electronic biosensor that is able to identify bacteria in less than ten minutes. This technology exploits bacteriocins, protein toxins naturally produced by bacteria, as the selective biological detection element. The bacteriocins are integrated with an array of potassium-selective sensors in Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor technology to provide an inexpensive bacterial biosensor. An electronic platform connects the CMOS sensor to a computer for processing and real-time visualization. We have used this technology to successfully identify both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria commonly found in human infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.