Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27618094›Full record

ArticleNutrients2016

Evidence Synthesis and Translation for Nutrition Interventions to Combat Micronutrient Deficiencies with Particular Focus on Food Fortification.

Mark Lawrence, Kate Wingrove, Celeste Naude, Solange Durao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A call to action to reshape evidence synthesis and use for nutrition policy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark LawrenceInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood 3125, Australia. lawrence@deakin.edu.au.
Kate WingroveInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood 3125, Australia. k.wingrove@deakin.edu.au.
Celeste NaudeCentre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa. cenaude@sun.ac.za.
Solange DuraoCochrane Nutrition, Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Stellenbosch University and South African Cochrane Centre, South African Medical Research Council, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa. Solange.Durao@mrc.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over two billion people suffer from micronutrient deficiencies. Food fortification is a prominent nutrition intervention to combat such deficiencies; however, its effectiveness, risks, and ethical implications vary depending on the contexts associated with the deficiency it is addressing and the circumstances with its implementation. The aim of this research was to analyse the profile of nutrition interventions for combating micronutrient deficiency with particular focus on food fortification reported in existing systematic reviews (SRs), guidelines and policy statements, and implementation actions for nutrition. A review of secondary data available from online databases of SRs, guidelines and policy statements, and implementation actions, categorised as either "nutrition-specific interventions" (NSpI) or "nutrition-sensitive interventions" (NSeI), was conducted. Currently, there is evidence available for a diversity of food fortification topics, and there has been much translation into action. Indeed, food fortification and micronutrient supplementation interventions and NSpI more broadly dominate the profile of interventions for which there were SRs, guidelines, and policy statements available. The findings demonstrate that, although there is a rational linear relationship between evidence synthesis and translation in formulating policy and actions to combat micronutrient deficiencies, the various nutrition interventions available to help combat micronutrient deficiencies are not equally represented in the evidence synthesis and translation processes. Effective and safe policies and actions to combat micronutrient deficiencies require decisions to be informed from a body of evidence that consists of evidence from a variety of interventions. Into the future, investment in making available a higher number of SRs, guidelines and policy statements, and actions of NSeI is indicated.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineFood, FortifiedDatabases, FactualHumansMalnutritionMicronutrientsNutritional StatusNutrition PolicyRecommended Dietary AllowancesMicronutrientsevidence synthesisfood fortificationmicronutrient deficiencynutrition-sensitivenutrition-specificpolicysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27618094
PMCPMC5037540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.