Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27618023›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) and Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) Workshop 2016: Scientific Opportunities and Logistics for Cancer Clinical Trial Incorporation.

Lori E Lowes, Scott V Bratman, Ryan Dittamore, Susan Done, Shana O Kelley, Sabine Mai, Ryan D Morin, Alexander W Wyatt, Alison L Allan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02955173 (Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02955173 nacompletednot on this map

Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) Detected by the CTCBIOPSY System as Potential Blood-based Biomarkers in Providing Prognostic and Predictive Information for Surgical Treatment of Gastric and Rectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorQilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityRan2016 to 2021Enrolled467ConditionsCirculating Tumor Cells, Colorectal Cancer, Gastric CancerArmsSurgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Cell-Free DNA for the Management of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lori E LowesLondon Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6K 4L6, Canada. Lori.Lowes@lhsc.on.ca.
Scott V BratmanDepartments of Radiation Oncology and Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada. Scott.Bratman@rmp.uhn.ca.
Ryan DittamoreEpic Sciences Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA. ryan.dittamore@epicsciences.com.
Susan DoneCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research and Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada. Susan.Done@uhn.ca.
Shana O KelleyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3M2, Canada. shana.kelley@utoronto.ca.
Sabine MaiManitoba Institute of Cell Biology, Cancer Care Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada. Sabine.Mai@umanitoba.ca.
Ryan D MorinDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. rdmorin@sfu.ca.
Alexander W WyattVancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3Z6, Canada. awyatt@prostatecentre.com.
Alison L AllanLondon Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6K 4L6, Canada. Alison.Allan@lhsc.on.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the identification of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as potential blood-based biomarkers capable of providing prognostic and predictive information in cancer, they have not been incorporated into routine clinical practice. This resistance is due in part to technological limitations hampering CTC and cfDNA analysis, as well as a limited understanding of precisely how to interpret emergent biomarkers across various disease stages and tumor types. In recognition of these challenges, a group of researchers and clinicians focused on blood-based biomarker development met at the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) Spring Meeting in Toronto, Canada on 29 April 2016 for a workshop discussing novel CTC/cfDNA technologies, interpretation of data obtained from CTCs versus cfDNA, challenges regarding disease evolution and heterogeneity, and logistical considerations for incorporation of CTCs/cfDNA into clinical trials, and ultimately into routine clinical use. The objectives of this workshop included discussion of the current barriers to clinical implementation and recent progress made in the field, as well as fueling meaningful collaborations and partnerships between researchers and clinicians. We anticipate that the considerations highlighted at this workshop will lead to advances in both basic and translational research and will ultimately impact patient management strategies and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicBiomarkers, TumorDNADNA, NeoplasmHumansNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingBiomarkers, TumorDNADNA, Neoplasmcell-free DNA (cfDNA)circulating tumor cells (CTC)circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)clinical trialsconference reportoncology

Identifiers

PMID27618023
PMCPMC5037782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.