Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27618010›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

Advances and Future Applications of Augmented Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Salazar Jones, Howard M Eisenberg, Xiaofeng Jia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Heterologous fibrin biopolymer as an emerging approach to peripheral nerve repair: a scoping review.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Salazar JonesDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. sjones2@smail.umaryland.edu.
Howard M EisenbergDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. heisenberg@smail.umaryland.edu.
Xiaofeng JiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. xjia@smail.umaryland.edu.

Funding

Brain Monitoring and Therapeutic Hypothermia after Cardiac ArrestR01HL118084 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JIA, XIAOFENG · 2013 to 2018
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL118084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries remain a significant source of long lasting morbidity, disability, and economic costs. Much research continues to be performed in areas related to improving the surgical outcomes of peripheral nerve repair. In this review, the physiology of peripheral nerve regeneration and the multitude of efforts to improve surgical outcomes are discussed. Improvements in tissue engineering that have allowed for the use of synthetic conduits seeded with neurotrophic factors are highlighted. Selected pre-clinical and available clinical data using cell based methods such as Schwann cell, undifferentiated, and differentiated stem cell transplantation to guide and enhance peripheral nerve regeneration are presented. The limitations that still exist in the utility of neurotrophic factors and cell-based therapies are outlined. Strategies that are most promising for translation into the clinical arena are suggested.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsForecastingHumansNeural Stem CellsPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPeripheral NervesSchwann CellsStem Cell TransplantationTissue Engineeringnerve conduitsneurotrophic factorsperipheral nerveperipheral nerve regenerationstem cells

Identifiers

PMID27618010
PMCPMC5037771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.