Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27617429›Full record

ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2016

A minimized human insulin-receptor-binding motif revealed in a Conus geographus venom insulin.

John G Menting, Joanna Gajewiak, Christopher A MacRaild, Danny Hung-Chieh Chou, Maria M Disotuar, Nicholas A Smith, Charleen Miller, Judit Erchegyi, Jean E Rivier, Baldomero M Olivera and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toxins in disguise: Neuropeptide mimicry across animal venoms.General and comparative endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. High-resolution crystal structure of the Mu8.1 conotoxin from Conus mucronatus.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

John G MentingWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Joanna GajewiakDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Christopher A MacRaildMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3694-3989
Danny Hung-Chieh ChouDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Maria M DisotuarDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Nicholas A SmithLa Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Charleen MillerSentia Medical Sciences, San Diego, California, USA.
Judit ErchegyiSentia Medical Sciences, San Diego, California, USA.
Jean E RivierSentia Medical Sciences, San Diego, California, USA.
Baldomero M OliveraDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Briony E ForbesDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Brian J SmithLa Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Raymond S NortonMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8893-0584
Helena Safavi-HemamiDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Michael C LawrenceWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
University of Utah · USLa Trobe University · AUMonash University · AUFlinders University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Copenhagen · DKWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insulins in the venom of certain fish-hunting cone snails facilitate prey capture by rapidly inducing hypoglycemic shock. One such insulin, Conus geographus G1 (Con-Ins G1), is the smallest known insulin found in nature and lacks the C-terminal segment of the B chain that, in human insulin, mediates engagement of the insulin receptor and assembly of the hormone's hexameric storage form. Removal of this segment (residues B23-B30) in human insulin results in substantial loss of receptor affinity. Here, we found that Con-Ins G1 is monomeric, strongly binds the human insulin receptor and activates receptor signaling. Con-Ins G1 thus is a naturally occurring B-chain-minimized mimetic of human insulin. Our crystal structure of Con-Ins G1 reveals a tertiary structure highly similar to that of human insulin and indicates how Con-Ins G1's lack of an equivalent to the key receptor-engaging residue Phe

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntigens, CDConus SnailHumansInsulinModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein MultimerizationReceptor, InsulinSelenocysteineVenomsAntigens, CDINSR protein, humanInsulinReceptor, InsulinSelenocysteineVenoms

Identifiers

PMID27617429
OpenAlexW2520082113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.