Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27617294›Full record

ArticleScience advances2016

Hidden drivers of low-dose pharmaceutical pollutant mixtures revealed by the novel GSA-QHTS screening method.

Ismael Rodea-Palomares, Miguel Gonzalez-Pleiter, Soledad Gonzalo, Roberto Rosal, Francisco Leganes, Sergi Sabater, Maria Casellas, Rafael Muñoz-Carpena, Francisca Fernández-Piñas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Platform for High-Throughput Assessments of Environmental Multistressors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ismael Rodea-PalomaresDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4630-7345
Miguel Gonzalez-PleiterDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Soledad GonzaloDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28871 Madrid, Spain.
Roberto RosalDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28871 Madrid, Spain.
Francisco LeganesDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1019-2291
Sergi SabaterInstitut Català de Recerca de l'Aigua, Carrer d'Emili Grafhit, 101, 17003 Girona, Spain.; Instituto de Ecología Acuática, Universidad de Girona, Campus de Montilivi, 17071 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3730-0261
Maria CasellasInstitut Català de Recerca de l'Aigua, Carrer d'Emili Grafhit, 101, 17003 Girona, Spain.
Rafael Muñoz-CarpenaDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2838-1514
Francisca Fernández-PiñasDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7444-7601
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Alcalá · ESUniversity of Florida · USCatalan Institute for Water Research · ESUniversitat de Girona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ecological impacts of emerging pollutants such as pharmaceuticals are not well understood. The lack of experimental approaches for the identification of pollutant effects in realistic settings (that is, low doses, complex mixtures, and variable environmental conditions) supports the widespread perception that these effects are often unpredictable. To address this, we developed a novel screening method (GSA-QHTS) that couples the computational power of global sensitivity analysis (GSA) with the experimental efficiency of quantitative high-throughput screening (QHTS). We present a case study where GSA-QHTS allowed for the identification of the main pharmaceutical pollutants (and their interactions), driving biological effects of low-dose complex mixtures at the microbial population level. The QHTS experiments involved the integrated analysis of nearly 2700 observations from an array of 180 unique low-dose mixtures, representing the most complex and data-rich experimental mixture effect assessment of main pharmaceutical pollutants to date. An ecological scaling-up experiment confirmed that this subset of pollutants also affects typical freshwater microbial community assemblages. Contrary to our expectations and challenging established scientific opinion, the bioactivity of the mixtures was not predicted by the null mixture models, and the main drivers that were identified by GSA-QHTS were overlooked by the current effect assessment scheme. Our results suggest that current chemical effect assessment methods overlook a substantial number of ecologically dangerous chemical pollutants and introduce a new operational framework for their systematic identification.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysBacteriaDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental PollutantsPharmaceutical PreparationsWater Pollutants, ChemicalcomplexityfreshwatersGSAlow-dosemicroorganismsmixturespharmaceuticalsPollutionQHTS

Identifiers

PMID27617294
PMCPMC5014467
OpenAlexW2512550887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.