Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27617252›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2016

Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in mucosal gastric cancer and re-evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Si-Hak Lee, Cheol Woong Choi, Su Jin Kim, Chang In Choi, Dae-Hwan Kim, Tae-Yong Jeon, Dong-Heon Kim, Hyun Jung Lee, Ki-Hyun Kim, Sun-Hwi Hwang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. MicroRNA signatures associated with lymph node metastasis in intramucosal gastric cancer.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Si-Hak LeeDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.; Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Cheol Woong ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Su Jin KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Chang In ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.
Dae-Hwan KimDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.
Tae-Yong JeonDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.
Dong-Heon KimDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.
Hyun Jung LeeDepartment of Pathology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Ki-Hyun KimDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Sun-Hwi HwangDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.; Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital · KRPusan National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe selection of the appropriate treatment strategy for patients with mucosal gastric cancer (MGC) remains controversial. In the present study, we aimed to determine the risk factors for lymph node (LN) metastasis in MGC and reassess the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

methodsWe examined 1,191 MGC patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2005 and December 2014. We determined the clinicopathologic risk factors for LN metastasis among the MGC patients.

resultsAmong 1,191 patients with MGC, 42 patients (3.5%) had LN metastasis. Univariate analysis indicated that age ≤ 50 years (P = 0.045), tumor invasion to the muscularis mucosa (P < 0.001), tumor size > 2 cm (P = 0.014), presence of ulceration (P = 0.01), diffuse type as per Lauren classification (P = 0.005), and undifferentiated-type histology (P = 0.001) were associated with LN metastasis. Moreover, multivariate analysis indicated that tumor invasion to the muscularis mucosa (P = 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 4.909), presence of ulceration (P = 0.036; OR, 1.982), and undifferentiated-type histology (P = 0.025; OR, 4.233) were independent risk factors for LN metastasis. In particular, LN metastasis was observed in some MGC cases with indications for ESD, including absolute indications (1 of 179, 0.6%) and expanded indications (9 of 493, 1.8%).

conclusionAlthough MGC patients can be treated via ESD, we recommend that they undergo a more aggressive treatment strategy if they have tumor invasion to the muscularis mucosa, ulceration, or undifferentiated-type histology in the final pathology report.

Indexed as

Lymph nodesNeoplasm metastasisRisk factorsStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27617252
PMCPMC5016601
OpenAlexW2511266557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.