ArticleNano today2016
3D Printed Bionic Nanodevices.
Article in Nano today, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Boronate Esters Dynamic Networks for the Reduction of Mechanical Anisotropy in Vat 3D Printed Manufacts.ACS applied polymer materials · 2025Article
- Emerging Nanoparticle-Based Diagnostics and Therapeutics for Cancer: Innovations and Challenges.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Bio-hybrid electronic and photonic devices.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Development of 3D Printed Enzymatic Microreactors for Lipase-Catalyzed Reactions in Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Media.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Ingestible Functional Magnetic Robot with Localized Flexibility (MR-LF).Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022Article
- Machine learning-enabled feature classification of evaporation-driven multi-scale 3D printing.Flexible and printed electronics · 2022Article
- Aerosol JetInternational journal of bioprinting · 2022Article
- Additive Manufacturing of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS).Micromachines · 2021Review
- Ferromagnetic soft catheter robots for minimally invasive bioprinting.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Influences of Dispersions' Shapes and Processing in Magnetic Field on Thermal Conductibility of PDMS-FeMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Review
- Establishing a point-of-care additive manufacturing workflow for clinical use.Journal of materials research · 2021Review
- 3D Printed Neural Regeneration Devices.Advanced functional materials · 2020Article
- Additive manufacturing of three-dimensional (3D) microfluidic-based microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) for acoustofluidic applications.Lab on a chip · 2018Article
- Biomimetic Approaches Toward Smart Bio-hybrid Systems.Nano research · 2018Article
- Reprocessable thermosets for sustainable three-dimensional printing.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Electrochemically stimulating developments in bioelectronic medicine.Bioelectronic medicine · 2018Review
- Made-on-demand, complex and personalized 3D-printed drug products.BioImpacts : BI · 2018Article
- Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing.Chemical reviews · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to three-dimensionally interweave biological and functional materials could enable the creation of bionic devices possessing unique and compelling geometries, properties, and functionalities. Indeed, interfacing high performance active devices with biology could impact a variety of fields, including regenerative bioelectronic medicines, smart prosthetics, medical robotics, and human-machine interfaces. Biology, from the molecular scale of DNA and proteins, to the macroscopic scale of tissues and organs, is three-dimensional, often soft and stretchable, and temperature sensitive. This renders most biological platforms incompatible with the fabrication and materials processing methods that have been developed and optimized for functional electronics, which are typically planar, rigid and brittle. A number of strategies have been developed to overcome these dichotomies. One particularly novel approach is the use of extrusion-based multi-material 3D printing, which is an additive manufacturing technology that offers a freeform fabrication strategy. This approach addresses the dichotomies presented above by (1) using 3D printing and imaging for customized, hierarchical, and interwoven device architectures; (2) employing nanotechnology as an enabling route for introducing high performance materials, with the potential for exhibiting properties not found in the bulk; and (3) 3D printing a range of soft and nanoscale materials to enable the integration of a diverse palette of high quality functional nanomaterials with biology. Further, 3D printing is a multi-scale platform, allowing for the incorporation of functional nanoscale inks, the printing of microscale features, and ultimately the creation of macroscale devices. This blending of 3D printing, novel nanomaterial properties, and 'living' platforms may enable next-generation bionic systems. In this review, we highlight this synergistic integration of the unique properties of nanomaterials with the versatility of extrusion-based 3D printing technologies to interweave nanomaterials and fabricate novel bionic devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.